public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygport: How to use to build and install modified packages
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87twvej83q.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C1DB1AFD2EFB472D96FD43D3F1A62652@MartinsDell> (Martin	Anantharaman's message of "Fri, 15 May 2015 12:29:46 +0200")

Martin Anantharaman writes:
> In my experimentation with run (see preceding post with subject
> "run-1.3.3-1: Unicode text and empty args") I somehow managed to build a
> modifed version of a released package (run-1.3.3-1) but feel I have not
> found the right way of performing this task - so I ask for some advice (or
> referral to some How-To?) based on how I did it:
> - Get source: I did that via setup which placed the cygport-file
> (run.cygport) and source-archive in /usr/src
> - Unpack source: I wanted to do "cygport run prep" - but that failed to
> recognize the cygwin-run-1.3.3.tar.bz2 archive and I had to do "cygport run
> download" which downloaded cygwin-run-run.tar.bz2 instead. Why?

I'm using non-versioned cygport files and have patched cygport to deal
with those correctly.  The packaged cygport file should have been
run-1.3.3-1.cygport for the unpatched cygport version to work correctly.
Somehow that's not happening anymore, I'll have to see that how to
correct that.

The last "-run" is a result of the above and the "cygwin-run" at the
beginning is a result of the way cygport deals with Git repositories.
Cygport seems to prefer the versioned package file if it finds one over
the Git snapshot, I'm not sure if that's the way it should be.

> - Install: I thought I could install with "cygport run install" - but that
> installed in the staging area within the pacakge source-tree only. So I
> installed with "make install" for the time being. What is the right way,
> maybe using setup after packaging the modified package?

There is no right or wrong way, but you can just unpack into / for this
package.

> - Package: "cygport run package" works as expect, including creating patches
> - but the resulting packages (in dist) were run-run-run.tar.xz and
> run-src.tar.xz - so the version is somehow getting trashed within cygport.
> Does the cygport file at the outset need to be renamed to include the
> version?

Yes, until I can convince Yaakov to accept my patches.


Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptations for KORG EX-800 and Poly-800MkII V0.9:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KorgSDada

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-15 11:23 Martin Anantharaman
2015-05-15 14:06 ` Achim Gratz [this message]
2015-05-15 16:23   ` Achim Gratz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87twvej83q.fsf@Rainer.invalid \
    --to=stromeko@nexgo.de \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).