From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 106397 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2017 14:21:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 106342 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jun 2017 14:21:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*F:D*t-online.de, H*r:sk:mailout X-HELO: mailout01.t-online.de Received: from mailout01.t-online.de (HELO mailout01.t-online.de) (194.25.134.80) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:21:55 +0000 Received: from fwd08.aul.t-online.de (fwd08.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.151]) by mailout01.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id EC7CE431E91E for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:21:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.2.28] (T5ia1aZBrhGbt14n1Hsg2Wm9g3nKswrR0axrHp6Gy98s1uy4xZ2nkms0fe8kKsCZiB@[91.59.13.183]) by fwd08.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1dJhGw-1qrleS0; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:21:50 +0200 Subject: Re: CR-LF handling behavior of SED changed recently - this breaks a lot of MinGW cross build scripts To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B2636E4@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B26CE47@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <59399CC5.60900@tlinx.org> <417f84ac-5d9f-dc50-e912-973e90b8a128@redhat.com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B26F278@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <34b26965-34c2-b5f0-a3f2-b2c3df344b08@gmail.com> <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A175B270518@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <5313de97-d9bd-d9c9-cb4a-254a3eadcf4a@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= Message-ID: <893c8632-1ddf-720b-7009-7e50c5f1ab0d@t-online.de> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:21:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2 Am 10.06.2017 um 15:48 schrieb cyg Simple: > Uhm, 'wt' and 'wb' came from MS itself. GNU GCC was adapted to allow it > and just ignores it on systems that don't need it. Not really. Only "wt" is a DOS-/Windows-ism, while "wb" is part of the standard library, and has been ever since there has been a standard. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple