* RE: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin
@ 2001-10-28 4:21 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Billinghurst, David (CRTS) @ 2001-10-28 4:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Roman Belenov'; +Cc: 'Sailesh Ramakrishnan', cygwin
You are correct. gcj.exe et al are built buy default in gcc-3.0.x and 3.1 ,
but they don't work correctly.
-----Original Message-----
From: Roman Belenov [ mailto:rbelenov@yandex.ru ]
Sent: Friday, 26 October 2001 7:54
To: Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
Cc: 'Sailesh Ramakrishnan'; cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin
Well, I've built gcc 3.0.2 without any special configure switches and
gcj was built (file like gcj.exe in bin and jc1.exe in
lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.02 were installed). I don't sure that it
works (I'm not interested in Java myself), but at least it can be
compiled.
"Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com> writes:
> Yep. That is what we all get, even with gcc-3.1 from cvs. gcj isn't
> ported
> to cygwin (or any other platform). There has been some inconclusive
> work
> this year. Search the java mailing list archives at http://gcc.gnu.org
> for
> more information.
>
--
With regards, Roman.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin
2001-10-26 3:05 Ebrey, Carl
@ 2001-10-29 0:12 ` Robert Collins
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Robert Collins @ 2001-10-29 0:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ebrey, Carl; +Cc: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
On Fri, 2001-10-26 at 20:05, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
> Okay, no doubt I'm going to get horribly flamed for this but here goes...
> What's wrong with the j2sdk? Or are we going for native binaries from Java
> code here?
1) no mount table support.
2) dos vs unix path issues.
3) native binaries as you mention.
1) and 2) are the biggies in my book.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin
@ 2001-10-26 3:05 Ebrey, Carl
2001-10-29 0:12 ` Robert Collins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ebrey, Carl @ 2001-10-26 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
Okay, no doubt I'm going to get horribly flamed for this but here goes...
What's wrong with the j2sdk? Or are we going for native binaries from Java
code here?
Carl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roman Belenov [ mailto:rbelenov@yandex.ru ]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:54 AM
> To: Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
> Cc: 'Sailesh Ramakrishnan'; cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin
>
>
> Well, I've built gcc 3.0.2 without any special configure switches and
> gcj was built (file like gcj.exe in bin and jc1.exe in
> lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.02 were installed). I don't sure that it
> works (I'm not interested in Java myself), but at least it can be
> compiled.
>
> "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com> writes:
>
> > Yep. That is what we all get, even with gcc-3.1 from cvs.
> gcj isn't
> > ported
> > to cygwin (or any other platform). There has been some inconclusive
> > work
> > this year. Search the java mailing list archives at
> http://gcc.gnu.org
> > for
> > more information.
> >
>
> --
> With
> regards, Roman.
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
=======================================================================
Information in this email and any attachments are confidential, and may
not be copied or used by anyone other than the addressee, nor disclosed
to any third party without our permission. There is no intention to
create any legally binding contract or other commitment through the use
of this email.
Experian Limited (registration number 653331).
Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin
2001-10-25 16:39 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
@ 2001-10-26 2:57 ` Roman Belenov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Roman Belenov @ 2001-10-26 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Billinghurst, David (CRTS); +Cc: 'Sailesh Ramakrishnan', cygwin
Well, I've built gcc 3.0.2 without any special configure switches and
gcj was built (file like gcj.exe in bin and jc1.exe in
lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.02 were installed). I don't sure that it
works (I'm not interested in Java myself), but at least it can be
compiled.
"Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com> writes:
> Yep. That is what we all get, even with gcc-3.1 from cvs. gcj isn't
> ported
> to cygwin (or any other platform). There has been some inconclusive
> work
> this year. Search the java mailing list archives at http://gcc.gnu.org
> for
> more information.
>
--
With regards, Roman.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin
@ 2001-10-25 16:39 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2001-10-26 2:57 ` Roman Belenov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Billinghurst, David (CRTS) @ 2001-10-25 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Sailesh Ramakrishnan', cygwin
Yep. That is what we all get, even with gcc-3.1 from cvs. gcj isn't ported
to cygwin (or any other platform). There has been some inconclusive work
this year. Search the java mailing list archives at http://gcc.gnu.org for
more information.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sailesh Ramakrishnan [ mailto:sailesh@umich.edu ]
Sent: Friday, 26 October 2001 3:26
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin
Hi,
I have spent numerous hours trying to get gcc with java to compile. I got
the gcc source for 3.0.1 via cvs. After fixing the issues with SYS_ERROR
by #defining them in the respective header files, I get the following
error:
/home/sailesh/gcc/libjava/gnu/java/security/provider/gnu.java:31: Class
`gnu.jav
a.security.provider.Gnu' already defined in
/home/sailesh/gcc/libjava/gnu/java/s
ecurity/provider/Gnu.java:31.
public final class Gnu extends Provider
^
/home/sailesh/gcc/libjava/gnu/java/security/provider/gnu.java:34: confused
by ea
rlier errors, bailing out
make[2]: *** [libgcj.jar] Error 1
my build configuration was: ../configure
--with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/sailesh/gcc/gcc/version.c
--host=i686-pc-cygwin --enable-libgcj --enable-languages=c,c++,java
--prefix=/usr --nore cursion
I am doing this because the latest version of cygwin didnt get me a gcc
with java in it.
I would really appreciate any help
-- S
---------------------------------------------------
Sailesh Ramakrishnan sailesh@umich.edu
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin
@ 2001-10-25 10:26 Sailesh Ramakrishnan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sailesh Ramakrishnan @ 2001-10-25 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Hi,
I have spent numerous hours trying to get gcc with java to compile. I got
the gcc source for 3.0.1 via cvs. After fixing the issues with SYS_ERROR
by #defining them in the respective header files, I get the following
error:
/home/sailesh/gcc/libjava/gnu/java/security/provider/gnu.java:31: Class
`gnu.jav
a.security.provider.Gnu' already defined in
/home/sailesh/gcc/libjava/gnu/java/s
ecurity/provider/Gnu.java:31.
public final class Gnu extends Provider
^
/home/sailesh/gcc/libjava/gnu/java/security/provider/gnu.java:34: confused
by ea
rlier errors, bailing out
make[2]: *** [libgcj.jar] Error 1
my build configuration was: ../configure
--with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/sailesh/gcc/gcc/version.c
--host=i686-pc-cygwin --enable-libgcj --enable-languages=c,c++,java
--prefix=/usr --nore cursion
I am doing this because the latest version of cygwin didnt get me a gcc
with java in it.
I would really appreciate any help
-- S
---------------------------------------------------
Sailesh Ramakrishnan sailesh@umich.edu
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-10-29 0:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-10-28 4:21 unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-26 3:05 Ebrey, Carl
2001-10-29 0:12 ` Robert Collins
2001-10-25 16:39 Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
2001-10-26 2:57 ` Roman Belenov
2001-10-25 10:26 Sailesh Ramakrishnan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).