From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 78728 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2017 18:59:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 78719 invoked by uid 89); 19 Oct 2017 18:59:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:cygwin, H*M:b389, H*c:application X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:59:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1084F5A5A for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:59:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 1084F5A5A Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=yselkowitz@cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 1084F5A5A Received: from [10.10.120.41] (ovpn-120-41.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.41]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC46B5D9C1 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <7983d97c-3c6d-e3c2-2304-9527ad4c5735@gmail.com> <59e8f0cd.28279d0a.292b.4768@mx.google.com> From: Yaakov Selkowitz Message-ID: <8a790ade-1761-b87b-b389-5f76d147c099@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:59:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cGs1EKIT6RO6dRXXos2468TvXXDTWsi7d" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 --cGs1EKIT6RO6dRXXos2468TvXXDTWsi7d Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="cW5iI5RuidTB9KBnRJLHrs2aHMEViR1pH"; protected-headers="v1" From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin@cygwin.com Message-ID: <8a790ade-1761-b87b-b389-5f76d147c099@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- References: <7983d97c-3c6d-e3c2-2304-9527ad4c5735@gmail.com> <59e8f0cd.28279d0a.292b.4768@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: --cW5iI5RuidTB9KBnRJLHrs2aHMEViR1pH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 393 On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: > x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issue= s. As I have said several times, this assertion is incorrect. You need to use the triplet which matches the toolchain with which you are building. For example, Fedora and RHEL all use $arch-redhat-linux as their triplet, and there is nothing wrong with that. --=20 Yaakov --cW5iI5RuidTB9KBnRJLHrs2aHMEViR1pH-- --cGs1EKIT6RO6dRXXos2468TvXXDTWsi7d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-length: 224 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHMEARECADQWIQRFYAu5jKh4qpenARn/IK+aZu4flAUCWej1+hYceXNlbGtvd2l0 ekBjeWd3aW4uY29tAAoJEP8gr5pm7h+Uwy8An1KMQk0N6JKTO9HbJWh1BKs06A08 AJjiNEOQf11wdLZhmn3sbkvKePgX =0Sx4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cGs1EKIT6RO6dRXXos2468TvXXDTWsi7d--