public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
To: sten.kristian.ivarsson@gmail.com
Cc: 'cygwin' <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Named pipes and multiple writers
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:43:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c6c5655-c162-8361-9f44-376bbd7cf114@cornell.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00e001d604f9$d0aa0720$71fe1560$@gmail.com>

On 3/28/2020 8:10 AM, sten.kristian.ivarsson@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 3/27/2020 10:53 AM, sten.kristian.ivarsson@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On 3/26/2020 7:19 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
>>>>> On 3/26/2020 6:39 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/26/2020 6:01 PM, sten.kristian.ivarsson@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> The ENIXIO occurs when parallel child-processes simultaneously
>>>>>>> using O_NONBLOCK opening the descriptor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is consistent with my guess that the error is generated by
>>>>>> fhandler_fifo::wait.  I have a feeling that read_ready should have
>>>>>> been created as a manual-reset event, and that more care is needed
>>>>>> to make sure it's set when it should be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could provide a code-snippet
>>>>>>> to reproduce it if wanted ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, please!
>>>>>
>>>>> That might not be necessary.  If you're able to build the git repo
>>>>> master branch, please try the attached patch.
>>>
>>>> Here's a better patch.
>>>
>>>
>>> I finally succeeded to build latest master (make is not my favourite
>>> tool) and added the patch, but still no success in my little
>>> test-program (see
>>> attachment) when creating a write-file-descriptor with O_NONBLOCK
> 
>> Your test program fails for me on Linux too.  Here's the output from one
> run:
> 
> You're right. That was extremely careless of me to not test this in Linux
> first :-)

No problem.

> I can assure that we have a use case that works on Linux but not in Cygwin,
> but it seems like I failed to narrow it down in the wrong way
> 
> I'll try to rearrange my code (that works in Linux) to mimic our application
> but in a simple way (I'll be back)

OK, I'll be waiting for you.  BTW, if it's not too hard to write your test case 
in plain C, or at least less modern C++, that would simplify things for me.  For 
example, your pipe.cpp failed to compile on one Linux machine I wanted to test 
it on, presumably because that machine had an older C++ compiler.

Ken

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-28 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-25 11:11 sten.kristian.ivarsson
2020-03-25 12:44 ` Ken Brown
     [not found]   ` <18be01d602ab$0bbfca30$233f5e90$@gmail.com>
2020-03-26 14:06     ` Sv: " Ken Brown
2020-03-26 15:11       ` Ken Brown
2020-03-26 16:03         ` Norton Allen
2020-03-26 16:44           ` Ken Brown
2020-03-26 17:00             ` Norton Allen
2020-03-26 22:01       ` Sv: " sten.kristian.ivarsson
2020-03-26 22:39         ` Ken Brown
2020-03-26 23:19           ` Ken Brown
2020-03-27 13:10             ` Ken Brown
2020-03-27 14:53               ` Sv: " sten.kristian.ivarsson
2020-03-27 22:56                 ` Ken Brown
2020-03-27 23:00                   ` Ken Brown
2020-03-28 12:10                   ` Sv: " sten.kristian.ivarsson
2020-03-28 15:43                     ` Ken Brown [this message]
2020-03-29  2:19                       ` Ken Brown
2020-03-30 17:44                         ` Ken Brown
2020-03-31 21:10                           ` Sv: " sten.kristian.ivarsson
2020-03-31 22:02                             ` Ken Brown
2020-04-01  7:45                               ` Sv: " sten.kristian.ivarsson
2020-04-01 13:47                                 ` Ken Brown
2020-04-01  8:52                               ` sten.kristian.ivarsson
2020-04-01 16:15                                 ` Ken Brown
2020-04-01 17:14                                   ` Sv: " sten.kristian.ivarsson
2020-04-01 18:34                                     ` Ken Brown
2020-04-02  2:19                                       ` Ken Brown
2020-04-02  8:05                                         ` Sv: " sten.kristian.ivarsson
2020-04-02 12:47                                           ` Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Named pipes and multiple wri Gregery Barton
2020-04-02 18:21                                           ` Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Sv: Named pipes and multiple writers Ken Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c6c5655-c162-8361-9f44-376bbd7cf114@cornell.edu \
    --to=kbrown@cornell.edu \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    --cc=sten.kristian.ivarsson@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).