From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31B053948828 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 06:40:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 31B053948828 Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id s1so10013933wrv.5 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:40:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aHuoiGjLICSeBQYRT0ZN2MAccg4YebV+Z52a266BfFs=; b=AX7JSoLuzHgNga4S2aRKVLneuX9VdP2HBxqaKftE+aAwQM8Nv7QTAZXO5D5LNi0+Z5 Hse7TwPb6lFqrIRV+Y9/NA1SN+GHkXymnwV9DFlCrl3iRPYZJkmBB0dFpX6Q1y4rDouw 0CGPGVE2iiLyyHoG//QGEmHudGceYX2CuNWwr3fH9tk3xXSUpOswIcHmiw5YHfRkXACu bvXleTegV/19Nxc/pdLD9rC1PHy48JOnTbJezP8xgk1yvNBThkKZeA20S7TZyYMpIz+d KQMLplrBzGJXKIuWqNpF0jErMMqTAAmiLZnGZjl87HUriHG38PqpDb8cJteVVmBICqrk HGpA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3ibRpPhkRjkX9zol3JliDUUVo4BRIpCrBt5esoCTEANx3Gwgpw 1+cD4r0c1iRN1lHBAp173LKfeFSZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtkl0JGUClEPL9oBIWiLbudPPkLpcc9/Zf3dijNIdiVIe6QPXiziJvjup67kXUVr9XcfDQLvg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:eb51:: with SMTP id u17mr16654193wrn.29.1584772841950; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ee:6715:5401:e1b0:7aee:6ea6:8979? (p200300EE67155401E1B07AEE6EA68979.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ee:6715:5401:e1b0:7aee:6ea6:8979]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t1sm12521560wrq.36.2020.03.20.23.40.40 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1 (x86/x86_64) From: Marco Atzeri To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <8a6c6dcd-c235-a2bd-1437-c7efa8ba529b@t-online.de> Message-ID: <900c1391-59bd-52b2-d5d7-f0097000dad6@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:40:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, GARBLED_BODY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 06:40:44 -0000 Am 21.03.2020 um 05:55 schrieb Marco Atzeri: > Am 20.03.2020 um 20:24 schrieb Hans-Bernhard Bröker: >> Am 20.03.2020 um 00:18 schrieb Brian Inglis: >>> On 2020-03-18 23:25, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote: >> >>>> It seems something is adding 5M or more to the normal >>>> size of the programs >>> >>> See attached for summary details by arch, but main points for both >>> are, on x86_64: >> [...] >> >> Could this be due to the ginormous number of targets configured into >> the build? > > may be, as it also take ages to full compile with the > current configuration: > > #       --enable-shared > CYGCONF_ARGS=" >         --enable-install-libiberty >         --disable-gdb >         --disable-libdecnumber >         --disable-readline >         --disable-sim >         --enable-64-bit-bfd >         --enable-targets=all > " > > I am testing a build dropping the "enable-targets=all" > and also forcing the "enable-shared" > >      --enable-shared \ >         lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all > > > Hoping it will note ages again.... "NOT take" > > Marco > dropping the target seems to work very well current version $ du -sb /usr/bin/gprof.exe 5424147 /usr/bin/gprof.exe under build $ du -sb gprof/gprof.exe 19968 gprof/gprof.exe Jon, any clue why we are using a "enable-targets=all" options ? Any cross compiler should use its own binutils not the cygwin one, correct ? Marco