From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60286 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2020 21:34:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 60274 invoked by uid 89); 21 Feb 2020 21:34:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=activity, H*MI:sk:fqA1Ptu, H*f:CAD8GWsvx7QM7, settled X-HELO: smtp-out-no.shaw.ca Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (HELO smtp-out-no.shaw.ca) (64.59.134.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:34:27 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([24.64.172.44]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id 5FwFjUkUxkqGX5FwGjYFlE; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:34:25 -0700 Reply-To: Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca Subject: Re: Is Cygwin 3.1.X Stable Enough to Use? To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <817yBTNxU4176Set.1582206646@web03.cms.usa.net> <1613327751.20200220213642@yandex.ru> <20200221092029.da2c51cec466dc8339ee0906@nifty.ne.jp> <20200221110600.adf918ed5dbc4fce5a1067f3@nifty.ne.jp> <20200221184114.165a2b601b22bd0a990c9247@nifty.ne.jp> From: Brian Inglis Message-ID: <97d019bd-48b9-4725-6a7f-9b4cec7f73f1@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 21:34:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 On 2020-02-21 07:26, Lee wrote: > On 2/21/20, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 09:41, Takashi Yano wrote: >>> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 21:47:25 -0500, Lee wrote: >>>> On 2/20/20, Lee wrote: >>>>> I'll try backing out the registry change & see if it still happens. >>>> >>>> It doesn't happen now. >>>> >>>> I deleted HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Console\VirtualTerminalLevel >>>> rebooted >>>> deleted all the .o files under /source/tidy & rebuilt >>>> The output of cmake looks normal >>>> >>>> I updated cygwin this morning: >>>> 2020/02/20 07:49:28 Augmented Transaction List: >>>> 2020/02/20 07:49:28 0 install cygwin 3.1.4-1 >>>> 2020/02/20 07:49:28 1 erase cygwin 3.1.2-1 >>>> 2020/02/20 07:49:28 2 install cygwin-devel 3.1.4-1 >>>> 2020/02/20 07:49:28 3 erase cygwin-devel 3.1.2-1 >>>> >>>> is it possible that fixed it? >>> >>> I am not sure. In my environment the problem does not occur >>> even with cygwin 3.1.2. Therefore, the cause cannot be identified. >> I had the same issue and it was fixed by 3.1.4, so yes upgrading was >> likely the fix. > So, getting back to the OPs question about the stability of the > current cygwin.. I'd say yes, it is "stable" now. The only problem > I've seen doesn't happen after I upgraded and other pty issues seem to > be closing fast Check the git logs linked from the https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ page: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=shortlog https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=log and the patches mailing list archive: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/current/threads.html and you will see there is current activity which may be settled by the next release 3.1.5. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple