Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: coreutils 9.0 (TEST)

[Brian Inglis <Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca>]

On 2022-07-19 21:03, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2022-07-19 15:06, Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 7/19/2022 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>> On 2022-07-19 12:00, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>> On 7/19/2022 1:07 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>>>> Setup still shows coreutils 9.1 as test, but it should *NOT* be 
>>>>> installed by anyone.
>>>>
>>>> Then shouldn't you remove it?  And you could also upload an 
>>>> override.hint file with a "replace-versions" line for the sake of 
>>>> people who have already installed it.
>>>
>>> I tried various measures and thought override.hint with 
>>> replace-versions: 9.1-1 was there.
>>
>> It is there, so whatever you did worked.  But that doesn't prevent 
>> people from installing 9.1-1.  If someone installs 9.1-1, then the 
>> *next* time they run setup they'll get the suggestion to downgrade it. 
> 
> I previously asked about reverting the release, and did as suggested.
> 
>> If you really don't want anyone to install 9.1-1, you should remove it.
> 
> How do I get calm and setup to do that in the release area?

I have manually uploaded empty:

x86{,64}/release/coreutils{,/coreutils-debuginfo}/-coreutils-9.1-1.{,-src}.{hint,tar.xz}

and created !ready files in:

x86{,64}/release/coreutils{,/coreutils-debuginfo}/

which appears to have moved the files to the vault(/Attic) and dropped 
the entries from setup.ini

That seems like a job for a cygport command like remove/vault! ;^>

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]