From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17676 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2020 12:19:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 17664 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jan 2020 12:19:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=unusually, 18363592, release-information, releaseinformation X-HELO: mail-wr1-f44.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f44.google.com) (209.85.221.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:19:15 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id d16so19931921wre.10 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:19:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FXWd3oyy+CNNd+U6v2TRwkeNRvLbXNKGp0rOix2a790=; b=uuK6gRmSLEnh6B0kxyjDuxJEKF/rUuk0x1xPgQo+1kBrdPBQxhwWG1OB3vFjOQyNu9 iiFqm7Ns7k9UDFqq9u+Pm3fDHwe1kMw9Ndfrraivg9aeuz1k40NNAK6Di2QhrjNsVI/Y YlpA39T7sc2JLWvC8dPybg9q3EnqW2QYH2MMkXJEEBO+6R1I8ep18G52oVzrhuamBrfF vvkdxhduwsUP3hJ5VNTPl7pR8QydGebe0LlYv2N4Q4F3r4C2Z89L/r/cToQfxgGoteLN guxOpZk8RtV0eSs7tCqrz6pdqlqUiNxroLe79ZK261gzpHYUpt6RJ+bdBM11LMFKP+sE kRLg== Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ee:6727:2e01:1808:bdc:56d2:b7a7? (p200300EE67272E0118080BDC56D2B7A7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ee:6727:2e01:1808:bdc:56d2:b7a7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f1sm1961907wmc.45.2020.01.29.04.19.12 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:19:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: headache on build repeatibility: octave vs BLODA ? To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: <2904b4fa-6349-bd3e-c4ff-4b32a0bb3838@gmail.com> <87y2tvs278.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <9b370970-fcfe-cca9-321f-973de777642a@gmail.com> <878sluhcc1.fsf@Otto.invalid> <08ac898e-e7f9-c8e9-91ba-d4ee33f2e27c@gmail.com> <0fb5712c-7d57-d5cb-56b7-3a0d2f44d8a2@gmail.com> <20200127203346.1c8e3657d7283e3aa2c617d8@nifty.ne.jp> <85ddac25-0b4a-5e01-7885-0d2855c37a45@gmail.com> <20200129094427.GI3549@calimero.vinschen.de> From: Marco Atzeri Message-ID: <9e66f9f1-109f-7a3c-2c86-abd3ef7fc628@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:19:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200129094427.GI3549@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 Am 29.01.2020 um 10:44 schrieb Corinna Vinschen: > On Jan 28 07:41, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> Am 27.01.2020 um 12:33 schrieb Takashi Yano: >>> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 07:45:08 +0100 >>> Marco Atzeri wrote: >>>> Can you and Takashi provide me your cygcheck.out so that I can look on >>>> possible difference that could influence the build behaviour. >>> >>> Attached. >>> >> >> Thanks Takashi, >> >> I duplicated your installation from scratch on my W10 Home >> and it fails again in the same place. >> >> So I am now almost sure that the recent MS updates changed/broke >> something in W10 Home. :-(( >> >> Assuming it does not break German systems and left immune >> Japanese ones :-? >> >> I will try to install the same in a W10 Pro and if that >> does not segfault I can try the lengthy process to compare >> the object/dll/exec files to see where is the difference. >> >> >> Corinna, >> there are specific code differences in Cygwin DLL between >> W10 Home and Pro ? > > Sorry for the late reply, Marco. > > No, there are no code differences in Cygwin based on "Home" vs. "Pro" > vs. "Enterprise" editions. Differences are mainly based on Windows > versions, as in W10 1803, W10 1809, etc. Other differences in code > execution are based on workstation vs. server (evaluating scheduling > timing from registry) or stand-alone vs. domain machine (passwd/group > stuff). Of course, even small differences in your setup (Windows > permissions, etc.) may lead to very different code execution. > > If you suspect a Cygwin bug, it would be helpful to see an strace > of the crash. > > > Corinna > If is a BUG, it seems at compilation time as it produces binary with different behaviour than before. I was not able to segfault the old binary, I have problem in all new built binaries. I assume the 1909 build 18363.592 2020-01-14 arisen it. As Octave uses gnulib, it is possible that the changes in MS are causing a different subset of gnulib to be used than before, may be exposing a latent bug or race. Unfortunately my old build tree was polluted by mistake, so I can not directly compare a good build tree versus a failing one. Just noticed that MS released yesterday a 18363.628 2020-01-28 unusually just 2 weeks after previous one. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-information/ Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple