From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27791 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2010 18:15:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 27778 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2010 18:15:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_YG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vw0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.212.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:15:12 +0000 Received: by vws8 with SMTP id 8so2252842vws.2 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:15:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.158.71 with SMTP id e7mr1365991vcx.124.1280513710124; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.191.2 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:15:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C531528.8060805@cygwin.com> References: <4C52FCA3.3000800@cygwin.com> <4C53020D.9070209@cygwin.com> <4C530620.6080400@redhat.com> <4C531528.8060805@cygwin.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ash start-up issue From: Steven Collins To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg00647.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:08, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <> wrote: > On 7/30/2010 1:36 PM, Steven Collins wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:04, Eric Blake<> =A0wrote: >>> >>> On 07/30/2010 11:03 AM, Steven Collins wrote: >>>> >>>> shell also fails. I've tried reinstalling dash from startup.exe, but >>>> that has had no affect. I would have tried the same for ash, but I >>>> don't see what package is providing it. >>> >>> ash and dash are identical, and both provided by the dash package. >>> >>> If you can't start dash, I have to suspect interference from BLODA. >> >> I have two identically configured computers running the same corporate >> mandated software (potential BLODA). One starts ash fine, the other is >> the one under discussion. > > BLODA works in mysterious ways. ;-) > > Actually, timing is everything. =A0So tracking down the BLODA is a > worthwhile exercise, despite the apparent inconsistency. > > -- > Larry Hall =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0htt= p://www.rfk.com > RFK Partners, Inc. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(508) 893-9= 779 - RFK Office > 216 Dalton Rd. =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(508) 8= 93-9889 - FAX > Holliston, MA 01746 > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > A: Yes. >> >> Q: Are you sure? >>> >>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>> >>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? > > -- > Problem reports: =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: =A0 =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > If this is BLODA I'm just plain screwed because it is corporate driven and I have no control over it. This scenario is the biggest reason I hate seeing the BLODA response. It seems to me that it would be good to find ways to get Cygwin to work despite the presence of things that are considered BLODA. Many users are in a similar situation to my own where they are not the masters of what is on their computer. I take it from the BLODA response that neither of you sees any issue with the contents of the cygcheck file. Regards, Steven -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple