From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26652 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2012 18:58:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 26635 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Sep 2012 18:58:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from am1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com (HELO am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) (213.199.154.207) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:58:12 +0000 Received: from mail103-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.243) by AM1EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.3.204.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:58:10 +0000 Received: from mail103-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail103-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FDE2C0101 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:58:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.85;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BL2PRD0410HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -1 X-BigFish: PS-1(zz4015Izz1202h1d1ah1d2ahzzz31h2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah107ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh1155h) Received-SPF: softfail (mail103-am1: transitioning domain of elynx.com does not designate 157.56.240.85 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.85; envelope-from=tboemker@elynx.com; helo=BL2PRD0410HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ;.outlook.com ; Received: from mail103-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail103-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1347476289314272_19675; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from AM1EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.250]) by mail103-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC1080017 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0410HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.85) by AM1EHSMHS002.bigfish.com (10.3.207.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:58:07 +0000 Received: from BL2PRD0410MB373.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.55]) by BL2PRD0410HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.99.39]) with mapi id 14.16.0175.005; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:58:00 +0000 From: "Boemker, Tim" To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" Subject: ls shows different permissions for the same file Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: elynx.com Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 Larry, Do you mean that, with a POSIX path, I get ACL-based permissions, but with = Windows paths, I get just user-group-other permissions? That sounds reasonable, but shouldn't they agree as far as they overlap? I= n the following example, for example, shouldn't they agree whether foo is w= ritable by Domain Users? $ touch foo # create a plain file $ ls -li c:/cygwin/home/tboemker/foo /home/tboemker/foo 14918173765807874 -rw-r--r-- 1 tboemker Domain Users 1 Sep 12 14:47 /home/t= boemker/foo 14918173765807874 -rw-r--r-- 1 tboemker Domain Users 1 Sep 12 14:47 c:/cygw= in/home/tboemker/foo $ chmod 666 foo $ !l ls -li c:/cygwin/home/tboemker/foo /home/tboemker/foo 14918173765807874 -rw-rw-rw- 1 tboemker Domain Users 1 Sep 12 14:47 /home/t= boemker/foo 14918173765807874 -rw-r--r-- 1 tboemker Domain Users 1 Sep 12 14:47 c:/cygw= in/home/tboemker/foo Thanks, Tim -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple