From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092064106.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.64.106]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E7A6385E006 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:38:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6E7A6385E006 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=RCBnmw5QErRYzOftwGnRSqEupQWfTCs3RvAhYMAAPKMpcascnsvp8OApPjw+KDf1LOYFrFWrXYdmluS1/4ElOyTh0o/G5L9wZfKfaCD5zaz28xMeip1lKpw8eICAEeaKINrOXfRrEQ1F9ElrREdGyTgxiCz37YprxRTYyYx95VkCX9dJWSzDD01293Ah3fzbxjAEjNqApudRrxW4paKdfrRO2gSUp7opvaDha1R6N5bF7BgDridEUGf3fLv2t6/8pSXhOoAMki3Q10jM7r161f6ZzWHnAwlyvPhpYQdS9UCizsxsQo69i9Mo0Mr5f/An0X9zEgJNQw+wZ0rErD09lg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=yrtMIb/v7bo5Pgpkn6rqSjXwOxMGjylc3/JNZao97jE=; b=Yh1VgTg3aHDucVnqrAKALRIJJHvdSOGSMr3qhJkn+jrJ6KjbygvqqYVHmbqjgs6KFEz2UGepqxzkaIUWsaYwc3wOo80A19byFOEGYCXNxK+mLFEVv8o2oxE3/omTckSAmmLKAiOAsAZg702U1fT2hPIMixU3MLFqGn3JzxtPp52PN8sh550rupsXFrSmi5f23qt5Gg+kCvgrIdS01P5kBEC5ie8gqfblkfUm2F01S41gjspD6HIvFKY0wpKiNVDtabmKoaeNOq9NIU8mabm6jwQXdH7d0hOPx3J9lrdy9sH4v8CAmr/UkRsFeXa9ceXsCasAFZzJNoM6+WBD3SegqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none Received: from VE1EUR01FT058.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e19::50) by VE1EUR01HT087.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7e19::298) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2856.17; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:38:32 +0000 Received: from AM6PR03MB5282.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.152.2.53) by VE1EUR01FT058.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.3.136) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2856.17 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:38:32 +0000 Received: from AM6PR03MB5282.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd14:7e5a:6215:c631]) by AM6PR03MB5282.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd14:7e5a:6215:c631%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2835.023; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:38:32 +0000 From: Fergus Daly To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" CC: Fergus Daly Subject: RE: Problems with cursor position and hotkey commands in nano v.4.3 Thread-Topic: Problems with cursor position and hotkey commands in nano v.4.3 Thread-Index: AdYDZkAGhK3gBc0PQWqxTL4/oFopWAAAn7Dg Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:38:32 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:6918336710A9B3B4802F54403A911A9B2BC3DC85CF2AE637010551073EFB3515; UpperCasedChecksum:8EA7A8BEE93D83C1EF45B993685CA8141D7B3AF05A6A4A76FB8D522638161BF5; SizeAsReceived:6967; Count:45 x-tmn: [cdxpZWYwZb/z9uoj9RJF6vo1mKs3x3wi] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-incomingheadercount: 45 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 98a558c6-2386-4128-767c-08d7d1829816 x-ms-exchange-slblob-mailprops: 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 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1EUR01HT087: x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: P0pWtkuYU0rFyOB6BlnhvUFlIxJkhScA7FpuUD/+AABAAbK0exCrlFaZT54F9CeQaKMNWE535EmHkPHsIYUl4Oh6tJMsdl4l/QPM4ymdRoKvQadnrujWOaNchoQfMGWfZP0EapLWQpHY4kcU+fyI+XeIIHOJLHYJJvHKpJezoGdysK761UoyL/gJoYaglCwP x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: OWDyziVVPy5p5zA9XtaM5GSiRxbSLb39eCuTb7VI+nFqUu7VWk3IJL6O6R5tmyrYht8X7yXFde7dxgZHvztqTDiN80eAxQybXsQ45ril2+JMkdwYJEpOjOVLpGsNsV8yb4IoV4rDTVmPxly42beRXQ== x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 98a558c6-2386-4128-767c-08d7d1829816 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Mar 2020 12:38:32.3287 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1EUR01HT087 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:38:36 -0000 >> Anybody else having problems with cursor position and hotkey commands in= nano v.4.3? Further to above, and a bit different: I downloaded the current nano-4.9.tgz from source, extracted the source fil= es and within Cygwin ran the ./configure .. .. make .. .. make install trio. Perfect glich-free installation showing the new nano executable and support= files located in /usr/local/bin/ and /usr/local/share/. (NB the Cygwin-provided nano v.4.3 installation remains in place.) The command $ echo $PATH returns /home/user/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin (so /usr/local/bin/ precedes /usr/bin/ as required) and the command # which nano returns /usr/local/bin/nano (as expected) BUT: the command $ nano --version returns GNU nano, version 4.3 which is not what is required, referring to the original and not the later = installation; and the command $ nano anynamedtextfile reveals on screen that nano v.4.3 not v.4.9 is being used. Q1 Am I doing / thinking / remembering something daft about command hierarc= hies, or should the expected v.4.9 be the one obtained (which it isn't)? Q2 Should I _necessarily_ uninstall the original v.4.3 - and if so, why, gi= ven the expected priority usages? Thank you!