From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6133 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2019 22:57:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 6126 invoked by uid 89); 28 Aug 2019 22:57:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:739, H*UA:Win32 X-HELO: zmcc-2-mx.zmailcloud.com Received: from zmcc-2-mx.zmailcloud.com (HELO zmcc-2-mx.zmailcloud.com) (52.37.197.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 22:57:27 +0000 Received: from zmcc-2.zmailcloud.com (zmcc-2-mta-1.zmailcloud.com [146.148.52.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by zmcc-2-mx.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A3840614; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:15:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from zmcc-2.zmailcloud.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmcc-2-mta-1.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2435DCD1A8; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:57:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmcc-2-mta-1.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1742DCD1A5; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:57:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from zmcc-2.zmailcloud.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmcc-2-mta-1.zmailcloud.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id f4ZZnzIWYfqa; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:57:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.1.144] (47-208-128-44.erkacmtk03.res.dyn.suddenlink.net [47.208.128.44]) by zmcc-2-mta-1.zmailcloud.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8594CCEBF; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:57:24 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 00:02:00 -0000 From: Quanah Gibson-Mount Reply-To: Quanah Gibson-Mount To: Kaz Kylheku <920-082-4242@kylheku.com>, cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Bug report: Killing a native process may not actually kill it Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <893c47a5235335c035a83536ab3cd899@mail.kylheku.com> References: <20190828154553.GQ11632@calimero.vinschen.de> <893c47a5235335c035a83536ab3cd899@mail.kylheku.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2 --On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 2:33 PM -0700 Kaz Kylheku <920-082-4242@kylheku.com> wrote: > Cygwin can't introduce Unix-like shutdown mechanisms (like the > handling a non-fatal signal) into non-Cygwin processes which have > no concept of that. It makes no sense. My original post contained a link to a patch allowing for Cygwin to correctly terminate native Windows processes. I understand it is not the position of the Cygwin project to deal with situation, so I think we can just let it drop. Regards, Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple