From: Edward McGuire <cygwin.com@metaed.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: cygcheck's understanding of TZ
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 22:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimGpyki6w1d9xDhfteiQJvToRAbgA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110609210632.GA1457@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> We're not changing anything. Having the date there is useful.
>
> Again: you shouldn't use "cygcheck -s" as a method to find the system
> date.
While strictly true, I doubt that continuing to repeat this caution
will be worthwhile. You pointed out that having the date there is
useful. I won't try to mind-read the OP's purpose, but I don't suppose
it was simply to display the date, and I do suppose it is better
served now that he knows how to get the date right.
Cheers,
MetaEd
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-09 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 7:47 EXCOFFIER Denis
2011-06-09 7:54 ` Thomas Wolff
2011-06-09 17:44 ` Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
2011-06-09 17:39 ` Edward McGuire
2011-06-09 18:08 ` Charles Wilson
2011-06-09 19:27 ` Edward McGuire
2011-06-09 19:50 ` Denis Excoffier
2011-06-09 21:06 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-06-09 22:01 ` Edward McGuire [this message]
2011-06-10 7:25 ` Denis Excoffier
2011-06-10 14:07 ` Edward McGuire
2011-06-10 14:30 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-06-10 17:44 ` Denis Excoffier
2011-06-13 15:07 ` Edward McGuire
2011-06-13 15:34 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-06-14 15:05 ` Lee Maschmeyer
2011-06-14 15:28 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-06-14 17:30 ` Lee Maschmeyer
2011-06-14 17:51 ` Edward McGuire
2011-06-14 18:35 ` Lee Maschmeyer
2011-06-14 19:19 ` Edward McGuire
2011-06-14 19:22 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-06-14 19:21 ` Christopher Faylor
2011-06-09 18:58 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTimGpyki6w1d9xDhfteiQJvToRAbgA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=cygwin.com@metaed.com \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).