From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17573 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2012 16:56:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 17566 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2012 16:56:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from blu0-omc1-s24.blu0.hotmail.com (HELO blu0-omc1-s24.blu0.hotmail.com) (65.55.116.35) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:56:43 +0000 Received: from BLU0-SMTP441 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s24.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:56:42 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([77.27.89.90]) by BLU0-SMTP441.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 09:56:41 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 16:56:00 -0000 From: Aaron Schneider User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: mintty and modifier keys References: <500829BD.3010108@cs.utoronto.ca> In-Reply-To: <500829BD.3010108@cs.utoronto.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00402.txt.bz2 On 19/07/2012 17:37, Ryan Johnson wrote: > Hi all (mostly Andy), > > I notice that mintty 1.1 handles certain key combinations differently > than xterm: > > Thanks, > Ryan > Could you report it to the mintty developer? http://code.google.com/p/mintty/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple