public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
@ 1999-06-14  1:58 William Gacquer
  1999-06-30 22:10 ` William Gacquer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Gacquer @ 1999-06-14  1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mumit Khan; +Cc: cygwin, egcs

Hi! 
	gcc-2.95 does not perform very well compared to egcs1.1.2 on a win32
platform. Please have a look at this small benchmark collection :
 <<tench.zip>> Take care : it contains a pure win32 makefile!
	Any idea why gcc-2.95 is so slow?
	Regards,
	William

William Gacquer
Ubi Studios - Ubi Soft Entertainment

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mumit Khan [SMTP:khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU]
> Sent:	Saturday, June 12, 1999 7:35 PM
> To:	William Gacquer
> Cc:	cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Subject:	RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
> 
> On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, William Gacquer wrote:
> 
> > Hello!
> > 	I did some benchmarks in order to compare egcs 1.1.2 with gcc 2.95.
> > The last one is much slower than egcs 1.1.2 (except in one test). Why
> are
> > the binaries (with full optimisation) so slow with gcc 2.95?
> 
> I have no idea. It would be very useful if you can send a few testcases 
> to egcs@egcs.cygnus.com.
> 
> > On which egcs branch is it based?
> 
> GCC and EGCS are now merged, so egcs branch is irrelevant. The gcc-2.95
> branch is based mostly on the egcs mainline (not the egcs-1.1.x branch).
> 
> Regards,
> Mumit
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
  1999-06-14  1:58 [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin William Gacquer
@ 1999-06-30 22:10 ` William Gacquer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Gacquer @ 1999-06-30 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mumit Khan; +Cc: cygwin, egcs

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1156 bytes --]

Hi! 
	gcc-2.95 does not perform very well compared to egcs1.1.2 on a win32
platform. Please have a look at this small benchmark collection :
 <<tench.zip>> Take care : it contains a pure win32 makefile!
	Any idea why gcc-2.95 is so slow?
	Regards,
	William

William Gacquer
Ubi Studios - Ubi Soft Entertainment

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mumit Khan [SMTP:khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU]
> Sent:	Saturday, June 12, 1999 7:35 PM
> To:	William Gacquer
> Cc:	cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Subject:	RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
> 
> On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, William Gacquer wrote:
> 
> > Hello!
> > 	I did some benchmarks in order to compare egcs 1.1.2 with gcc 2.95.
> > The last one is much slower than egcs 1.1.2 (except in one test). Why
> are
> > the binaries (with full optimisation) so slow with gcc 2.95?
> 
> I have no idea. It would be very useful if you can send a few testcases 
> to egcs@egcs.cygnus.com.
> 
> > On which egcs branch is it based?
> 
> GCC and EGCS are now merged, so egcs branch is irrelevant. The gcc-2.95
> branch is based mostly on the egcs mainline (not the egcs-1.1.x branch).
> 
> Regards,
> Mumit
> 

[-- Attachment #2: tench.zip --]
[-- Type: application/zip, Size: 7223 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
  1999-06-10 16:31 Mumit Khan
@ 1999-06-30 22:10 ` Mumit Khan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mumit Khan @ 1999-06-30 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

I've uploaded GCC-2.95 (upcoming merged egcs and gcc release) dev snapshot
binaries for Cygwin for those who want to see what's new and what's hot.
Since the release of gcc-2.95 has been pushed back quite a bit due to the
merging of FSF GCC and EGCS GCC, this may be a chance to check out the
new features without having to wait a few weeks (at the very least).

This is *only* meant for developers who may want to try out the newer
features that will be part of the real release (such as the capability
to create COM interfaces); expect problems, bugs, and so on. Please don't 
download unless you're willing to live on the edge.

ftp://ftp.xraylith.wisc.edu/pub/khan/gnu-win32/cygwin/snapshots/gcc-2.95-19990609/

Regards,
Mumit


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
  1999-06-12 11:42 ` Mumit Khan
@ 1999-06-30 22:10   ` Mumit Khan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mumit Khan @ 1999-06-30 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: William Gacquer; +Cc: cygwin

On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, William Gacquer wrote:

> Hello!
> 	I did some benchmarks in order to compare egcs 1.1.2 with gcc 2.95.
> The last one is much slower than egcs 1.1.2 (except in one test). Why are
> the binaries (with full optimisation) so slow with gcc 2.95?

I have no idea. It would be very useful if you can send a few testcases 
to egcs@egcs.cygnus.com.

> On which egcs branch is it based?

GCC and EGCS are now merged, so egcs branch is irrelevant. The gcc-2.95
branch is based mostly on the egcs mainline (not the egcs-1.1.x branch).

Regards,
Mumit



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
  1999-06-11  2:16 William Gacquer
  1999-06-12 11:42 ` Mumit Khan
@ 1999-06-30 22:10 ` William Gacquer
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Gacquer @ 1999-06-30 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

Hello!
	I did some benchmarks in order to compare egcs 1.1.2 with gcc 2.95.
The last one is much slower than egcs 1.1.2 (except in one test). Why are
the binaries (with full optimisation) so slow with gcc 2.95?
On which egcs branch is it based?
	Regards,
	William

William Gacquer
Ubi Studios - Ubi Soft Entertainment

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mumit Khan [SMTP:khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU]
> Sent:	Thursday, June 10, 1999 11:00 PM
> To:	cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Subject:	[ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
> 
> I've uploaded GCC-2.95 (upcoming merged egcs and gcc release) dev snapshot
> binaries for Cygwin for those who want to see what's new and what's hot.
> Since the release of gcc-2.95 has been pushed back quite a bit due to the
> merging of FSF GCC and EGCS GCC, this may be a chance to check out the
> new features without having to wait a few weeks (at the very least).
> 
> This is *only* meant for developers who may want to try out the newer
> features that will be part of the real release (such as the capability
> to create COM interfaces); expect problems, bugs, and so on. Please don't 
> download unless you're willing to live on the edge.
> 
> ftp://ftp.xraylith.wisc.edu/pub/khan/gnu-win32/cygwin/snapshots/gcc-2.95-1
> 9990609/
> 
> Regards,
> Mumit
> 
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
  1999-06-11  2:16 William Gacquer
@ 1999-06-12 11:42 ` Mumit Khan
  1999-06-30 22:10   ` Mumit Khan
  1999-06-30 22:10 ` William Gacquer
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mumit Khan @ 1999-06-12 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: William Gacquer; +Cc: cygwin

On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, William Gacquer wrote:

> Hello!
> 	I did some benchmarks in order to compare egcs 1.1.2 with gcc 2.95.
> The last one is much slower than egcs 1.1.2 (except in one test). Why are
> the binaries (with full optimisation) so slow with gcc 2.95?

I have no idea. It would be very useful if you can send a few testcases 
to egcs@egcs.cygnus.com.

> On which egcs branch is it based?

GCC and EGCS are now merged, so egcs branch is irrelevant. The gcc-2.95
branch is based mostly on the egcs mainline (not the egcs-1.1.x branch).

Regards,
Mumit



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* RE: [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
@ 1999-06-11  2:16 William Gacquer
  1999-06-12 11:42 ` Mumit Khan
  1999-06-30 22:10 ` William Gacquer
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William Gacquer @ 1999-06-11  2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

Hello!
	I did some benchmarks in order to compare egcs 1.1.2 with gcc 2.95.
The last one is much slower than egcs 1.1.2 (except in one test). Why are
the binaries (with full optimisation) so slow with gcc 2.95?
On which egcs branch is it based?
	Regards,
	William

William Gacquer
Ubi Studios - Ubi Soft Entertainment

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mumit Khan [SMTP:khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU]
> Sent:	Thursday, June 10, 1999 11:00 PM
> To:	cygwin@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Subject:	[ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
> 
> I've uploaded GCC-2.95 (upcoming merged egcs and gcc release) dev snapshot
> binaries for Cygwin for those who want to see what's new and what's hot.
> Since the release of gcc-2.95 has been pushed back quite a bit due to the
> merging of FSF GCC and EGCS GCC, this may be a chance to check out the
> new features without having to wait a few weeks (at the very least).
> 
> This is *only* meant for developers who may want to try out the newer
> features that will be part of the real release (such as the capability
> to create COM interfaces); expect problems, bugs, and so on. Please don't 
> download unless you're willing to live on the edge.
> 
> ftp://ftp.xraylith.wisc.edu/pub/khan/gnu-win32/cygwin/snapshots/gcc-2.95-1
> 9990609/
> 
> Regards,
> Mumit
> 
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin
@ 1999-06-10 16:31 Mumit Khan
  1999-06-30 22:10 ` Mumit Khan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mumit Khan @ 1999-06-10 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cygwin

I've uploaded GCC-2.95 (upcoming merged egcs and gcc release) dev snapshot
binaries for Cygwin for those who want to see what's new and what's hot.
Since the release of gcc-2.95 has been pushed back quite a bit due to the
merging of FSF GCC and EGCS GCC, this may be a chance to check out the
new features without having to wait a few weeks (at the very least).

This is *only* meant for developers who may want to try out the newer
features that will be part of the real release (such as the capability
to create COM interfaces); expect problems, bugs, and so on. Please don't 
download unless you're willing to live on the edge.

ftp://ftp.xraylith.wisc.edu/pub/khan/gnu-win32/cygwin/snapshots/gcc-2.95-19990609/

Regards,
Mumit


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1999-06-30 22:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-06-14  1:58 [ANN] gcc-2.95 1999-06-09 dev snapshot for Cygwin William Gacquer
1999-06-30 22:10 ` William Gacquer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-06-11  2:16 William Gacquer
1999-06-12 11:42 ` Mumit Khan
1999-06-30 22:10   ` Mumit Khan
1999-06-30 22:10 ` William Gacquer
1999-06-10 16:31 Mumit Khan
1999-06-30 22:10 ` Mumit Khan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).