public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Karr <davidmichaelkarr@gmail.com>
To: The Cygwin Mailing List <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: Re: "kubectl exec" in Cygwin gets "Upgrade request required", but not in cmd shell
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:39:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA5t8Vo8AcKg84acBhGefyO7WFR_Bwu_xLadDhPeUd4dnq1Z7Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA5t8Vrao2csnVGNy4p396+nDBiU0eJGcsz=SV7WrUGYPwXfsw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:10 AM David Karr wrote:

>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:32 PM David Karr wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 12:09 PM Brian Inglis <
>> Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2020-06-14 12:16, David Karr via Cygwin wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 10:20 AM Brian Inglis <
>>> > Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On 2020-06-14 09:38, David Karr via Cygwin wrote:
>>> >>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 2:25 AM Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>> >>>> On 14.06.2020 08:12, David Karr wrote:
>>> >>>>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:31 PM Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
>>> >>>>>>     On 13.06.2020 20:53, David Karr via Cygwin wrote:
>>> >>>>>>> I've been using kubectl in Cygwin on Windows 10 for quite a
>>> while,
>>> >>>>>>> to communicate to our in-house k8s clusters. I often use "kubectl
>>> >>>>>>> exec" to open a shell in a container or directly execute a shell
>>> >>>>>>> command.
>>> >>>>>>> This has worked perfectly fine for a long time.
>>> >>>>>>> A couple of days ago, I discovered that all of these attempts
>>> were
>>> >>>>>>> failing with "Upgrade request required".  I hadn't upgraded
>>> kubectl
>>> >>>>>>> or Cygwin in quite a while. I doubt our clusters had a k8s
>>> upgrade,
>>> >>>>>>> but it's entirely possible.
>>> >>>>>>> A colleague of mine has a very similar desktop configuration
>>> >>>>>>> (Windows 10, Cygwin), and he's not seeing this symptom.
>>> >>>>>>> I noticed that when I ran "kubectl exec" with max verbosity, it
>>> shows
>>> >>>>>>> the resulting "curl" command that it runs. I tried that resulting
>>> >>>>>>> command, and it results in the same response. I then tried
>>> updating
>>> >>>>>>> my Cygwin tools and retesting, no change.>>>>> I then took the
>>> >> entire resulting "kubectl exec" command line and ran
>>> >>>>>>> it in a "cmd" shell.  No problem at all.  No error.
>>> >>>>>>> I know I haven't provided much useful information yet. I wanted
>>> to
>>> >>>>>>> get an initial response before I started providing those
>>> diagnostics.
>>> >>>>>>> Is there a clear issue here that I'm not aware of?
>>> >>
>>> >>>>> from where is kubectl coming from ?
>>> >>>>> In cygwin I found only a kubectl.py in the ansible package
>>> >>
>>> >>>>>> It's from here:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>
>>> https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/tools/install-kubectl/#install-kubectl-on-windows
>>> >>
>>> >>>> so it is NOT a cygwin program.
>>> >>>> If the warning is coming about curl, it is likely
>>> >>>> that using from cygwin you are using the cygwin curl
>>> >>>> and from CMD the windows one
>>> >>>> $ which -a curl
>>> >>>> /usr/bin/curl
>>> >>>> /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/curl
>>> >>>> $ /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/curl -V
>>> >>>> curl 7.55.1 (Windows) libcurl/7.55.1 WinSSL
>>> >>>> Release-Date: 2017-11-14, security patched: 2019-11-05
>>> >>>> Protocols: dict file ftp ftps http https imap imaps pop3 pop3s smtp
>>> >> smtps
>>> >>>> telnet tftp
>>> >>>> Features: AsynchDNS IPv6 Largefile SSPI Kerberos SPNEGO NTLM SSL
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> $ /usr/bin/curl -V
>>> >>>> curl 7.66.0 (x86_64-pc-cygwin) libcurl/7.66.0 OpenSSL/1.1.1f
>>> zlib/1.2.11
>>> >>>> brotli/1.0.7 libidn2/2.2.0 libpsl/0.21.0 (+libidn2/2.0.4)
>>> >>>> libssh/0.8.7/openssl/zlib nghttp2/1.37.0
>>> >>>> Release-Date: 2019-09-11
>>> >>>> Protocols: dict file ftp ftps gopher http https imap imaps ldap
>>> ldaps
>>> >>>> pop3 pop3s rtsp scp sftp smb smbs smtp smtps telnet tftp
>>> >>>> Features: AsynchDNS brotli Debug GSS-API HTTP2 HTTPS-proxy IDN IPv6
>>> >>>> Kerberos Largefile libz Metalink NTLM NTLM_WB PSL SPNEGO SSL TLS-SRP
>>> >>>> TrackMemory UnixSockets
>>> >>>> the support Forum https://discuss.kubernetes.io/
>>> >>>> is probably the most indicate place for guidance
>>> >>
>>> >>> I thought it was obvious that it was not working because it was
>>> calling
>>> >> the
>>> >>> Cygwin curl. I wouldn't have posted here if that wasn't obvious to
>>> me.
>>> >>> And since I'm well aware of the k8s community, I already posted
>>> questions
>>> >>> about this in the appropriate place, before I posted here.
>>> >>> What I was hoping to get here was some indication or thoughts on why
>>> a
>>> >>> process using Windows curl doesn't have a problem, but does have a
>>> >> problem
>>> >>> when using Cygwin Curl. This isn't likely something that Cygwin curl
>>> is
>>> >>> doing "wrong", it's just that it's doing something different.
>>> >>> If it matters, the following is an elided version of the resulting
>>> curl
>>> >>> command:
>>> >>>     curl -k -v -XPOST  -H "User-Agent: kubectl.exe/v1.18.0
>>> >> (windows/amd64)
>>> >>> kubernetes/9e99141" -H "Authorization: Bearer ..." -H
>>> >>> "X-Stream-Protocol-Version: v4.channel.k8s.io" -H
>>> >>> "X-Stream-Protocol-Version: v3.channel.k8s.io" -H
>>> >>> "X-Stream-Protocol-Version: v2.channel.k8s.io" -H
>>> >>> "X-Stream-Protocol-Version: channel.k8s.io" 'https://
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> .../api/v1/namespaces/.../pods/.../exec?command=%2Fbin%2Fls&container=...&stderr=true&stdin=true&stdout=true'
>>> >>> I can't tell from the logging what request body it sent. It's
>>> possible it
>>> >>> didn't send any.
>>> >>
>>> >> We can't tell, not knowing who you are, and from what you are posting,
>>> >> what may
>>> >> or may not be obvious to you, where you are seeing "Upgrade request
>>> >> required",
>>> >> or where that may be coming from.
>>> >> That you need diagnostic help indicates that, what may appear obvious
>>> to
>>> >> you,
>>> >> may not be the case, as it is often our assumptions which lead us
>>> astray,
>>> >> and we
>>> >> get daily proof that we are imperfect, which is why most of seek to
>>> talk
>>> >> over
>>> >> and explain our issues to inanimate objects or colleagues e.g. talk
>>> to the
>>> >> rubber duck, teddy bear, plush hippo, etc. (My shelf holds two ducks
>>> and a
>>> >> pelican awarded by former projects.)
>>> >>
>>> >> For help with Cygwin, we need to see *whole* commands and all the
>>> output
>>> >> between
>>> >> the shell prompts, preferably with context, in this case including
>>> PATH
>>> >> under
>>> >> Cygwin and MS Windows and/or program paths typed or invoked.
>>> >>
>>> >> You may retain privacy and security by substituting variables e.g. env
>>> >> vars $VAR
>>> >> to sanitize sensitive information: to avoid problems I use a script
>>> to do
>>> >> so
>>> >> that logs are never written containing sensitive content.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Acknowledged. The "Upgrade request required" is coming from the
>>> kubernetes
>>> > server.  At this point, I think I'm going to need to understand exactly
>>> > what that message means (other threads talking about this didn't make
>>> that
>>> > clear). Someone in that community did respond to my question, not with
>>> an
>>> > answer, but with a query for more information. I'll see what I can
>>> find out.
>>>
>>> A short Google search turned up that the message is apparently an HTTP
>>> 400 Bad
>>> Request response with Upgrade request message, meaning you need to use
>>> the
>>> websocket API to talk to a kubernetes pod:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49250370/kubernetes-pod-exec-api-upgrade-request-required
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455
>>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/101
>>
>>
>> Yes, I saw that thread in my research on this, but note that that
>> conclusion about using WebSocket is only from the first sentence of the
>> answer, whereas by the end of the answer, including the comment, it's clear
>> that this should be mitigated by just using "kubectl exec", which is what
>> I'm doing. In any case, it appears that even kubectl uses curl under the
>> covers. I would assume that kubectl attempts to mitigate the issues around
>> not using WebSocket for this, but it seems like it's not working at least
>> in my case.
>>
>> Another thought I had is whether I can coerce kubectl to use the Windows
>> curl by setting the PATH just before calling kubectl.  This didn't help. Is
>> there possibly something happening under the covers that would still make
>> this execute the Cygwin curl?
>>
>
> I have managed to resolve this.  The challenge here is finding the correct
> version of kubectl to use for the corresponding cluster version.  The rule
> is that you have to use a version of kubectl within one minor version of
> the cluster version.  We're using version 1.13.5 in the cluster.  I
> originally saw this problem with version 1.17, then moved to 1.18, then to
> 1.13.5.  Finally, version 1.14.0 resolves the problem. Version 1.13.5
> should have worked.  I don't know why it didn't.  I also have no idea why
> it would work in a non-cygwin shell.
>
>
Actually, I was wrong about this being resolved. For some reason it was
working properly for a short period after I installed v1.14.0, but now it
is consistently failing with "Upgrade request required" again.

I've verified that the resulting kubectl call works fine from a cmd window.

Another thing that I didn't mention before is that I run a Linux VM on this
laptop, and I can run the same scripting layer, albeit with a Linux install
of kubectl, and it works perfectly fine.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-17 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-13 18:53 David Karr
2020-06-14  5:30 ` Marco Atzeri
2020-06-14  6:12   ` David Karr
2020-06-14  9:25     ` Marco Atzeri
2020-06-14 15:38       ` David Karr
2020-06-14 17:03         ` Marco Atzeri
2020-06-14 17:19         ` Brian Inglis
2020-06-14 18:16           ` David Karr
2020-06-14 19:08             ` Brian Inglis
2020-06-14 19:32               ` David Karr
2020-06-15 16:10                 ` David Karr
2020-06-17 16:39                   ` David Karr [this message]
2020-06-18  0:27                     ` Brian Inglis
2020-06-18 17:53                       ` David Karr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA5t8Vo8AcKg84acBhGefyO7WFR_Bwu_xLadDhPeUd4dnq1Z7Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=davidmichaelkarr@gmail.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).