From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 51416 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2018 15:12:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 51407 invoked by uid 89); 13 Mar 2018 15:12:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Our, our X-HELO: mail-io0-f179.google.com Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f179.google.com) (209.85.223.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:12:27 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id p78so478170iod.13 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=S/wn5QyoR+DZNr5S0H/ZCgzMoBD7gSlV7Ozn+Sm2x+c=; b=UahjuNc9ApxLLJ7xqo2Nj43XIjYk2eWhgiqjGgFNQtOminhVklqTKgBQEwZ0MuRb1X bS72+kgV2XwlnG2exMB5FjP3SIRTZNqFIo1RRRhtu2CJ+xOZ2pa1eN8OHMyi3JTdcxIH xZA++9g9qEFYkWxKo43NK8fyRJ+ygtNAnRfBJsQOwUjjHj6rk9GwEaPTG4X2sJ6vwLD1 WhvsrlIEQgFp//bu1YL4FNl3tqagRX+yMOCnPIZf/YDwNXxzs/1cOugcUyZ5KWCMD9+M N9EnysIO1d2FcnZDOS4xr0yRctLCR2kq56U2sv6x7AO/5ZFcNlZcnCAPEQJrXgOE9GJo RYcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EOTFWgRoXi55Op+DyCxjn3JJGnUxhBkdpaaxHnMh8YmCgLblwI enPHyAPiY4/0NoaC77gN1va9eIY9/ZDZ3sa79Zw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuglYg55Yx5GXjmqxsnHvtNnWLA7GZj92fcy+Ua38W513VWJCWEUCf2Q1NrxGmn8eBhJKK4QHB0p+/cxPpEJ+g= X-Received: by 10.107.32.145 with SMTP id g139mr1188735iog.56.1520953945342; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:12:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.150.93 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2018 08:12:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Lee Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: setup -g ??? To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 Should we still be using the -g (--upgrade-also) flag on setup? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jon Turney Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:26:27 +0000 Subject: Re: Problem running the latest python2-2.7.14-1 under AppVeyor To: The Cygwin Mailing List On 03/11/2017 14:45, Vadim Zeitlin wrote: > Our build has started on AppVeyor, a continuous integration provider, > started failing since a couple of days as a makefile command running a > Python script started failing with exit code 127 without any more > information. This is a strange situation as I can't reproduce the problem > locally, but something definitely seems to be wrong with this package on > the AppVeyor machine as Python just doesn't seem to be executable, e.g. the > output of these commands in our batch file driving the build: Perhaps you need to provide the -g (--upgrade-also) flag to cygwin's setup. Due to setup terribleness, without this flag, it will install the requested packages, and any missing dependencies of them, but not upgrade any of the dependencies which are already installed to the current (and perhaps needed) version... See also [1]. [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2017-03/msg00365.html -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple