From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CEF3945C17 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:54:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org F3CEF3945C17 Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id 130so7226892qkm.4 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:54:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rv9KGLx7nGves+5qKAzOj8hm3YSXiqDh2gTGN2Lkmmc=; b=ghSUY7voPCd1zAbGaLAYelaJLJ4y1y61JENY3l4QIMXKBxEjWggYIEtOepe9H4+Coj 6vwbyQw6nLUw4vPtgeR3kJ5PhbjL9FHxsDF2OBZbHG4VEQ8UL4Q3YMSypJqyRyXdqdzo FvASOHY2juOTaLqO4E2bWnqB+KCt/gML8iePwtT7QJHu28XdBDhU49Yln0kRpq1WSzfq FVbOn9tJeA19y33PwbDCT1tmQoOAMmsntvpXrjG6bHWZMkWNFj2tuRxhECmGGGOnVTV5 vn1f2mHCwGCP5U3uuDiHNzY+RRSnDMc3BNRLopayVzs4HIU5cXOAXo2j1A82cQQSP22M 8ObA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530s+HyamGpF+hxrBTR9oSD2B8EbUWbk6tnIREETKQ5/Xh+aSQDT QpKCkXxG4qlggrdbdVRdbFTZUyW+mtOphiiqD/DjmggOLoA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJ2eJSVvKUMndq4B41d8N7jkPPGJsHK/bAwhkV9Nr6Rm9wKxmXwtg3yl7PDJrMA37HR30c+Vgl0h9disJktpo= X-Received: by 2002:a37:42cb:: with SMTP id p194mr35141820qka.213.1618408489695; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:54:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a05:6214:14e:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:54:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <603461978.103298236.1618396574434.JavaMail.root@zimbra76-e14.priv.proxad.net> References: <369474148.103071581.1618392198922.JavaMail.root@zimbra76-e14.priv.proxad.net> <603461978.103298236.1618396574434.JavaMail.root@zimbra76-e14.priv.proxad.net> From: Lee Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:54:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygwin DLL 3.2.0 (W10) Problem with touch (8.26) for old dates < 1970 To: akiki@free.fr Cc: cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:54:51 -0000 On 4/14/21, akiki--- via Cygwin wrote: > Hi, > I encountered problems with the use of timestamps in cygwin. > May be it's an old problem, I don't know, using essentially files "recent= ly" > created/modified. > > > I want to say after 1970 No problem, but before ... > > > To day: > touch -m -t 190001011200.00 x gives touch: format de date =C2=AB 19000101= 1200.00 > =C2=BB incorrect > touch -m -t 190101011200.00 x gives ok - with ls -l x: > -rw-r--r-- 1 user group 0 1 janv. 1910 x Do you have the 32 bit cygwin installed? x86_64 Cygwin looks OK to me: $ touch -m -t 190001011200.00 x $ ls -l x -rw-rw-rw- 1 Lee None 0 Jan 1 1900 x $ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-10.0 i3668 3.1.7(0.340/5/3) 2020-08-22 17:48 x86_64 Cygwin Regards, Lee