From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 48016 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2015 21:19:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 48006 invoked by uid 89); 12 Apr 2015 21:19:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-lb0-f178.google.com Received: from mail-lb0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f178.google.com) (209.85.217.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:19:12 +0000 Received: by lbbuc2 with SMTP id uc2so45697407lbb.2 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:19:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.225.43 with SMTP id rh11mr10434533lbc.90.1428873548648; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:19:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.78.130 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 14:19:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.0.0-3 From: Bryan Berns To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00255.txt.bz2 On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi Cygwin friends and users, > > > New 2.0.0-0.3 test release. It's supposed to fix the pty chmod problem > reported in https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00240.html > Just a note: In 2.0.0-0.2, creating a file using touch on the root of one of my drives resulted in the with the Windows GUI Security tabs complaining about ACE order on the resultant file. In 2.0.0-0.3, Windows does not complain and the ACL looks quite a bit different (shown below). Not sure if this is a problem or not --- just wanted to report the difference in case your fix had an unintended side affect. Given my heart skips a beat when I see DENY ACEs, I like the new behavior behavior better. V:\>icacls v: v: BUILTIN\Administrators:(OI)(CI)(F) NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(OI)(CI)(F) NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(OI)(CI)(M) BUILTIN\Users:(OI)(CI)(RX) Output from file created from 2.0.0-0.3: V:\>icacls touch-from-3 touch-from-3 DOMAIN\Administrator:(R,W,D,WDAC,WO) DOMAIN\Domain Users:(R) Everyone:(R) BUILTIN\Administrators:(F) NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(F) NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(M) BUILTIN\Users:(RX) Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files Output from file created from 2.0.0-0.2: V:\>icacls touch-from-2 touch-from-2 NULL SID:(DENY)(Rc,S,WEA,X,DC) DOMAIN\Administrator:(R,W,D,WDAC,WO) DOMAIN\Domain Users:(DENY)(S,X) NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(DENY)(S,X) BUILTIN\Users:(DENY)(S,X) DOMAIN\Domain Users:(RX) NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(RX,W) NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(RX,W) BUILTIN\Administrators:(RX,W) BUILTIN\Users:(RX) Everyone:(R) Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple