Re: New version of GLM package?

["Carlo B." <carlo.bramini@gmail.com>]

Hello,
perhaps, if copying the files by hand is too heavy as another user
said, it is possible to use version 0.9.9.5, as I had written here:

https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2020-August/245981.html

it is not the latest version, but it is surely much newer than 0.9.7:
you just need to change version number and remove the patch now
useless from glm.cygport.

Sincerely.

Il giorno dom 20 dic 2020 alle ore 11:56 Marco Atzeri via Cygwin
<cygwin@cygwin.com> ha scritto:
>
> back on the mailing list
>
> On 20.12.2020 00:23, Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
> > Am 19.12.2020 um 19:21 schrieb Marco Atzeri via Cygwin:
> >
> >> for what I can see upstream has completely removed the install
> >> section from the cmake files on 0.9.9.8 .
> >>
> >> unclear why they performed such issue.
> >
> > Possibly because there isn't all that much to install for a "library"
> > that does not actually contain any compiled files, because it consists
> > of nothing but inlined templates in header files.
> >
> > I.e. the binary package would just be a subset of the source in a
> > different place.
> >
> > They seem to assume that the cmake script snippet they offer is
> > sufficient to make the package count as "installed", because that (with
> > an environment variable on top) allows the package to be found by CMake
> > packages.  The canonical method would probably be a CPack package.
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> I have impression debian is using such assumption and copy just the
> files in the proper place.
> It is annoying anyway.
>
> The fact that the github repository seems to not have the "issues"
> is another annoying problem of this package.
>
> Regards
> Marco
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple