From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90601 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2019 20:57:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 90594 invoked by uid 89); 10 Oct 2019 20:57:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Scott, scott X-HELO: mail-qk1-f180.google.com Received: from mail-qk1-f180.google.com (HELO mail-qk1-f180.google.com) (209.85.222.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:57:56 +0000 Received: by mail-qk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id y189so6951622qkc.3 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:57:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=9H5qrNzs7GpxD63IbLgXW2q93z0XezX+Cb0XXDsn6W0=; b=YNcuB3K34IRJyzVh3dNW3e1DBFUKKCI0JHNlZgrjEEC4axrGc5/dYGluB1TePFbODf OGKXnAGZb9Cu8zl86Gr5TJTIBkjhi+aQxmX7QIaF8fWYKnPlhw9ooL5sCKfUJff9ilLI 96xCANfpi7Vs8vrkoRyrWVu2AwQFsmS69Cc4qChTizxmBoqXXfINi7YzF3hc6hR5mM7T lU7Hsjpjpj2/m9Os+4ygAe6z7P/gTKuVZzZo6wgjXymGetsa5ck/p8Hp5xAgsFx3hvuT N6ihR7VlJAEZUi7Sbw9TSyKiph8W7f+oBZnXA70bU2HrboYv8wqttqVbV4Ri15ppFdRh sH5g== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2300fe24-fc50-3d1c-6b1b-bf6da6022d2e@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <71be3508-b11e-4681-eac6-9d44845088c7@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <1ac90af2-412d-345f-da40-8260ae527096@dronecode.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1ac90af2-412d-345f-da40-8260ae527096@dronecode.org.uk> From: Csaba Raduly Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: assert creates unusable core dump on current stable Cygwin release To: cygwin list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00059.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 9:19 PM Jon Turney wrote: > (and I guess this patch is not acceptable as-is, as it looks like it > would break x86) That was my reaction too. Csaba -- You can get very substantial performance improvements by not doing the right thing. - Scott Meyers, An Effective C++11/14 Sampler So if you're looking for a completely portable, 100% standards-conformant way to get the wrong information: this is what you want. - Scott Meyers (C++TDaWYK) -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple