From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-x141.google.com (mail-lf1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::141]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0EB388C022 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:04:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5A0EB388C022 Received: by mail-lf1-x141.google.com with SMTP id w15so8290956lfe.11 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:04:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mv+UmSoiHb1uzv25JfW0jG4BFC4E4STyeEo05QLiWDg=; b=j0sS0+4uUJ+FBggCfrT+hGiQT5JTQR/L8rcOxL5IwvjwsubMLfcuwem5HdgoCl+FNN SW4XbNkVXSeJNB7FGS1V4tDoY08XqL5ej2vvunKFhfQsPJkFghVada0eMe40C8XvdeAa 10z3OnfzZETnVuyGK9qYji0IWlnob9X0DCw7YUyie0fQ30J0D2nlo5+ub8n6715V/I6h Dl5zm14b5XYEUTiap62rqPTrzC+JcchFcbOtCFU6zukL5pn7vaghgvpBPwt7kbZfAKrx 0aXROYDfWOLeZdlwRrZiBzdGcpsm38Aepa6ITTGjSq9CYhJuXzeyDJKAOvEVpZSKzSOO 5qxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qcT+FlgOTxXLqJUq6bpLI2evy8xeB4+uJ8X4bDZj9PsRxLXxt OQX5wmw9UE6PZBcfILB8dwDRhXjVInPLKupWLetLxACd X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIZq8Eh/Z+J5XbnnrDUMlGn9wGPAl0lzJID2uFsFM2dt2yWK9ETsGq4jT3T0xfDZGs/NS8UwC8ZPVREOo0rfg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:10c3:: with SMTP id k3mr7767001lfg.33.1592762663102; Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:04:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <45a8baf1-f636-7c03-ec1f-7c72ee73c56d@SystematicSw.ab.ca> In-Reply-To: From: My Name Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 11:04:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Apparent bug in either (1) Cygwin default Package-list or (2) Package "bzr" dependency-list To: Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca Cc: The Cygwin Mailing List X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 18:04:26 -0000 This is mostly over my head, so I'm sorry if my comment here is irrelevant, but I'll point out in case anyone here doesn't know, Python 3 doesn't make Python 2 obsolete. They are somewhat incompatible. Python 2 source doesn't always run in Python 3 without extensive modification. If there's any message you all would like me to deliver to the Bazaar (bzr) forum, I will; but I'm not a Bazaar developer either, just a user. On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 9:16 AM Brian Inglis < Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca> wrote: > On 2020-06-20 08:41, Jon Turney wrote: > > On 19/06/2020 07:55, Brian Inglis wrote: > > This analysis is not complete or correct because it doesn't take > 'obsoletes:' > > into account: > > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=cygwin-apps/calm.git;a=commitdiff;h=d75abceedb46749982669236c5c102796a1fbfb1;hp=f92ad1d5c292ed54e7a62f5c52280efab8267f37 > > It does seem that things aren't working as intended, though. > > So does that obsoletes: mean something different than category: _obsoletes, > which I view as a (Debian-like) virtual package declaration? > Are obsoletes and pre-depends documented anywhere else (and any other new > keywords)? > > -- > Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada > > This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains > too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. > [Data in IEC units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.] > -- > Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >