From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16529 invoked by alias); 30 May 2019 10:31:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 16518 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2019 10:31:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=marco, H*c:alternative X-HELO: mail-it1-f176.google.com Received: from mail-it1-f176.google.com (HELO mail-it1-f176.google.com) (209.85.166.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:31:06 +0000 Received: by mail-it1-f176.google.com with SMTP id t184so9000615itf.2 for ; Thu, 30 May 2019 03:31:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=teC4EyC7jVvrfJWovJizOQprFXmGZjzGQdY8wz2joV8=; b=RIjTFnRA1DQ5pHWXSsCozUxBqFkLFghIO65BzW9a8ioljMc9M0DBRqsHnvaVD1gMML M8CDvCKh6goj+zUsf6fod9pCJmNamFED5tSEQ8sRASa4CN3Wed0KbjFJByqS5QrvZh0K uIqRSeind/qFLfqWaSittxRIrwxIPY4v07w9+IbrT0qAVkzao1DQgsVE7qKm37ibUMLM IA2+w8xiFP6ikk442LGxnd+qHziAMb532Sjga9OyiY9s5qjBKNaX0dN4GuklBK+qI85Y wSRJ2Ym1/78WM2blNYxgLMXAs5xLuQP7GyD736DrHouRUq+gdlGqxfM7BQTTfjie69KM 9cOg== MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ivan Shynkarenka Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 10:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: cmake-3.13.1-1 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-05/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2 > > I have no problem, but Tony thinks that as the cmake test suite test > is not perfect so he prefers to stay with the old one. > > 99% tests passed, 4 tests failed out of 548 > > > I was not able to identify the failures root cause, > and I suspect they are not fundamental and related to the test > suite itfelf. > > Regards > Marco > > Old cmake 3.6.2-1 is very-very old and not actual in C++ world. I use new cmake 3.13.1-1 test version for half a year and see no issues. I think 4 failed tests of 548 that are not affect of main functionality is not a good reason to delay cmake release for so long time... I vote to move a new cmake from test to release! -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple