From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 122322 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2015 19:10:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 122297 invoked by uid 89); 26 Nov 2015 19:10:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-lf0-f45.google.com Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com (HELO mail-lf0-f45.google.com) (209.85.215.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:10:07 +0000 Received: by lffu14 with SMTP id u14so107143734lff.1 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:10:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.219.197 with SMTP id pq5mr15646529lbc.73.1448565003914; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.163.106 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:10:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bnag4p58.fsf@Rainer.invalid> References: <834mgax9lj.fsf@gnu.org> <20151126135158.GO2755@calimero.vinschen.de> <87bnag4p58.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [h-e-w] cygwin-64 2.3.1. bash fails when running under FSF emacs 24.5 From: Dominique de Waleffe To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00441.txt.bz2 There never was any reason to do as I have so far always been able to run a version of Emacs compiled without cygwin without any blocking issue but still running cygwin tools under emacs (and that has been a case for a very long time!). I have no religious opinion on this but I don't see why I should add a dependency that, in "principle" should not be needed. The previous build of Emacs on the gnu site was already build with mingw and afaik it works. It is just that the current combination does not, in my case. I have no clue as to which version of mingw is involved in those two emacs builds. But maybe you're onto something there... Do you have any suggestion as how to validate your hypothesis? My goal is not to complain and just have a quick work around, I'd rather report the issue and if possible help in resolving the issue... I see that my download has finished... I'll setup this vm and try what I can with it.... Regards, D. ############################ # Dominique de Waleffe # ddewaleffe -at- gmail -dot- com ############################ On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Dominique de Waleffe writes: >> Meanwhile, I'll make a VM with a fresh install of Win10 (v1511 x64) >> and just Emacs + cygwin and see whether there is something fishy about >> my current setup after the upgrades it went through... > > Is there any reason why you don't use the Emacs that comes with Cygwin? > Rebasing Cygwin won't help a bit if some of the GNUwin or MinGW > (depending on the build) librraies that Emacs is compiled with collide > in that same address space. > > > Regards, > Achim. > -- > +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ > > Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: > http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple