From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15214 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2015 17:26:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 15204 invoked by uid 89); 3 Aug 2015 17:26:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-yk0-f175.google.com Received: from mail-yk0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-yk0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:26:01 +0000 Received: by ykoo205 with SMTP id o205so26185429yko.0 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:26:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.86.139 with SMTP id k133mr22342130ywb.53.1438622759901; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.193.66 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: cygwin@cygwin.com From: Nicholas Clark To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 Hi all, I remember seeing a bunch of traffic on the subject of rebasing a few years ago, with people saying that it wouldn't be necessary once we moved over to 64-bit Cygwin. Did that wind up being true? I've got some in-house tools that some of our developers want to use on Cygwin, and I've been thinking about the best way to maintain remote installations. If I use some kind of scripted deployment/update, do I actually need to keep everything rebased? -Nick -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple