From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13377385781E for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 03:51:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 13377385781E Received: by mail-oo1-xc2d.google.com with SMTP id m37-20020a4a9528000000b002b83955f771so354324ooi.7 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:51:58 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M9Nq5ZillPW3N7XI5VmgCRli5wQ54x56TZUYt8amrDY=; b=DevA0w4yfQLrZmAn/5aMtqgBXggRruWW4UiKj4pOzZystNli2OejIZMF8mnohNtaDI zmrVC9IRXq82yakfeFETHuU4s48z2drc+65/520jA7fOfdP6GvrQVbUZFK96VLm/m/iq xLYp/u49lswD0ZFqw+iXbafYFZ7ZaKRer1AA3IHIJOeHoB8rXGCmVDCZVGYtrSiCmHDl /pGEkt4e8nKEO0tgcsm1QnDe3Zpzf6gLorJk1a8eb/TtEj/HxEjp12N1c3oeILPPqtNB WcOmFghT+ZuPpuEgGhRcpTSGvqApklxU9R7Ug2O7m0GV9vys2kZPcFvSYlocKRpSqG3D ixeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320n88NiJLWdAI+e7R7jqAeJh5KHBt5QNcgkUL3N571Po97FRkM RSt4BurJPmxFBR/9Abl0pBfpG5lCEt+bsWKb/x4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEfeN+lBpmuzWJ9D4YSifwmPzY2MiDNPG3aDUthEBcsr/fJFsKHyb64kyvOCI1N2ft18l6At4pH1Nx84L/Jz8= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:b501:: with SMTP id r1mr6338801ooo.20.1636516317256; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 19:51:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <05c4180e-396b-4af3-ac0c-2ab8125df17e@cornell.edu> <0971ace1-5ee8-bdcc-5fd9-4551b294ebf8@cornell.edu> <75197fd0-d5da-3236-a7df-b8ffc3f67da7@cornell.edu> In-Reply-To: From: Backwoods BC Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:51:45 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Another pipe-related problem? To: Ken Brown Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 03:51:59 -0000 Please pardon the interjection. I'm a hardware guy and any time a hardware process is in a state where it is waiting for a signal from another process, I put in a timeout mechanism. Shouldn't this be a normal practice for software as well?