From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6ED53858D37 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:56:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D6ED53858D37 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org D6ED53858D37 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52d ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710834998; cv=none; b=ZAPockeKeNdWmuPT77wUNMsm9+CuhhrPuMLa+J4+xpZZAtm0fdgxMFCcQfQow+ApShhgktSf2o4Q4FnbcwRSyu0rWLds7fC+UagA5+TZpxI6/Zk63xYPtuUAfqMd0ObyDQbzvSvRDA8B5QY9T4s1nH+fLCbQgr+b7N4izz+3Ti4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710834998; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6+Qj9vfLkEvJquA1JRN0gUdJeNKajVIsNMStsu8XsCI=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=AW6TUSutLc5j7AbjpHKivxlpUwED5uLqWUrH6PiaD9Y1oVpzbX2gSl4hdGRjaQNA/IWj2z1YC6uE6qCMzKGl2o7w9vgjWEHN+RNObS6hW5S+p+IFyDNTcqQJaeFuwL4McBBmq30I9jOM3d6klZcr0Ck7SNG0AqiGRxLjfTM721w= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-56a0c0a7ebcso2271850a12.1 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:56:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710834994; x=1711439794; darn=cygwin.com; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TYm5a5bGhAOU2mspcod0c0Znq1Fg1/nxPHWcC9nBA8A=; b=hGn0ZkNKPmdOo7rAR8OpT5DBtIk3IdGdUs700DXu8MIDi76D0wSzu7YtTs4wuH9DQk apn3l/u/pniMTRqNdOPwVo10uSW5KD2CbHb3o5xLAsmwnIFqdfM8SS2R3xOg0uskL2mo dvTaiXtVvU3gymvWRFAF6qrh7gVfKS6wA6hnzHmS/qtbGQFPFHzfM3DDi8+06Dxli1iw Z3GkhTAAuH4AcEAyOdATxIkg4ha8Wu2Y5hhUyYVECpCyF6wHluQ2r2c/f/Fj0CtEjYJA 4h5kvC0hkJSdf/WKO0S6e7VYaNwWpz3K92gTsEsxKUIx3EpFEfLPv6tvVs+Z9qy/u3wi +9NQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710834994; x=1711439794; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TYm5a5bGhAOU2mspcod0c0Znq1Fg1/nxPHWcC9nBA8A=; b=sUbnzLhvdRbAnsjl5XEpr98eEw3sg/7mo8n4qsgUt2ujbwCgqTizsIpmp4eZonEh22 t4a8njbASfyNK9uJv9y3cCUyVCvlunbGMx3nYL+yegYdNIFJEwaDLD6CXeF1aXfCprUj on/R5ebicbTx1tXTECueSGYCeHaEBzY3hgTV7LqPY4DJwvuPJzo4FBeqpHeP53Eguv03 87p/1l2NFQ44Qx61HRDXOoLNAHsuvivekBaAhSSwV3HweLXsHxKCTdJvnn6jvvymlDMF 3jS7bBsTNkiTaMV4EJvENZ71B8L90G8iqLTUm7sBRQTHDyHfmn0MZztenVm/oV1V/0EF U2IQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxKw341pTVAaWnbMV/2shTLKpGZZC28y4BUIS8LNgEUY/ro3tTq 1efQDSJpTzGTWtmBJLI1bZji2BgUCMU9ZKLPgwiCgWQ27WhLxL1ZzhZ2IARaaRTBuAViZe3zlb+ tlYakatwwViiefEyLKKe+JN6YV1+s+vkM X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFYmL++WGeT2gUXgWP6Hy60cd3s2wAkD6hGcdLQRo3g1bZtqLiNQYocgJoYZ8Rnz/NpBEYIq89CZKAignq/uUA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3589:b0:568:d315:b85e with SMTP id y9-20020a056402358900b00568d315b85emr4202819edc.36.1710834993973; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:56:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9bec816c-66ea-49cb-baaa-47137fa2938f@GMail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Cedric Blancher Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:55:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: No Win ACLs for NFS? Re: ACEs and ACLs To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 15:43, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > > On Mar 18 08:30, J. Terry Corbet via Cygwin wrote: > > Thank you for the greatly needed assistance, but the reference to which you > > have pointed me says that noacl will be ignored in the case of ntfs file > > systems. > > No, it doesn't say that. It says > > "The flag is ignored on NFS filesystems." > ^^^ > not NTFS Do ACLs work for NFS in Cygwin, or are they turned off for NFS? I recall the Exceed (now OpenText) docs say that Exceed NFSv4 for Windows supports ACLs, but they are defunct for Cygwin2. Is this true? I'm also asking because the ms-nfs41-client Windows NFSv4.1 driver now has ACL support (like the Exceed NFSv4 driver), but it would be frustrating if Cygwin just turns this off. Or maybe I am misinterpreting this... @Corinna Vinschen? Ced -- Cedric Blancher [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+CedricBlancher/] Institute Pasteur