From: David Goldberg <dsg18096@gmail.com>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Openldap 2.4.48-1 vs my company's pki
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 20:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN9EdkYzh558w=CG3UkzgN0rg98eVx2V0BcdktEwVEW3dS1qCQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ftmje5zb.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Thanks but unfortunately even after don't that I still get the complaint
that they're is a self signed certificate in the chain. We do indeed run
our own CA but it seems like that should not really be a problem.
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019, 15:13 Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> wrote:
> David Goldberg writes:
> > I updated openldap from 2.4.42-1 to 2.4.48-1 this morning and now
> > ldapsearch will not connect, complaining that the server provided
> > certificate is self signed. I have set up /etc/pki with my company's
> > certificate chain and that allows 2.4.42-1 (and earlier) and other
> > applications to properly authenticate local services.
>
> The PKI layout was slightly changed a while ago and the newer openssl
> library used by the fresh openldap build may not pick up on the old
> locations anymore. What you should do is place the certificates into
> the /etc/pki/ca-trust/source/anchors/ directory, then run
>
> # update-ca-trust extract
>
> which should correctly populate the directories that the libaries and
> applications use.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Achim.
> --
> +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
>
> Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER:
> http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves
>
> --
> Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-02 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-02 15:45 David Goldberg
2019-08-02 17:28 ` Quanah Gibson-Mount
2019-08-02 19:13 ` Achim Gratz
2019-08-02 20:08 ` David Goldberg [this message]
2019-08-03 6:43 ` Achim Gratz
2019-08-05 12:22 ` David Goldberg
2019-08-05 19:25 ` Quanah Gibson-Mount
2019-08-05 19:39 ` Achim Gratz
[not found] ` <228DE7899A9CF9C913C8B1B8@192.168.1.39>
2019-08-05 20:06 ` David Goldberg
2019-08-05 20:31 ` Quanah Gibson-Mount
2019-08-05 22:41 ` Brian Inglis
2019-08-06 15:23 ` David Goldberg
2019-08-06 16:44 ` Achim Gratz
2019-08-06 19:17 ` David Goldberg
2019-08-06 21:20 ` David Goldberg
2019-08-07 18:35 ` Achim Gratz
[not found] ` <F9D491FCA6B56B38D0C0B1D6@192.168.1.39>
2019-08-03 2:42 ` David Goldberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN9EdkYzh558w=CG3UkzgN0rg98eVx2V0BcdktEwVEW3dS1qCQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dsg18096@gmail.com \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).