From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C93C13858CDB for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 14:03:39 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C93C13858CDB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=iname.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=iname.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org C93C13858CDB Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=74.208.4.200 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710857030; cv=none; b=YZ7gaCO6DqNkVZpNX/qmtNEO5K+qeInhUvMsQ8bG/5eXaHo+rAmWRmMzH1jooiLkgGP9m/VxHyoXyBL5PbXGhJ9/ErsoYA76eeIYpNWOBDZL44S+2kCgdmxjBXlgJ9aY1mRySMCjuX7HLEKLieE5SM2uWY7HfmGWivamEyCMsdg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1710857030; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ooJFAzmdovFVveFazzAn4rqNF04YPpLJ9H2A0jK6bAU=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=H3AbUt2aXc7kfZE2ZNuJDOKOcnCXyeq17VrsLBeiy6/2LzBulstDUs94Ipc1R80mHa6YvFiNFdnn4t6LrHgNWAFBWeGFqnRhneB4FxElayH8RVUN4cLR7ZxHGeqCqWNM82U3yqY2xit+8pIsTVAsddUwCkM68ufO3CjO5s+mQac= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iname.com; s=s1089575; t=1710857019; x=1711461819; i=bstewart@iname.com; bh=ooJFAzmdovFVveFazzAn4rqNF04YPpLJ9H2A0jK6bAU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To; b=bZT+E0dYKS9dosK0PLW6CAAl/XODKIQPymIqyO1DWYF5yILF1vgP0G6KxmNC5YWY LzVPhh/ocAeY/5WcqhHYZe/SCkF8Oc1cpVtTpdzF0v04pkIUFsbxWW1U+XlW/9uTW 4eEfGYOHob4UITntmc2Y3z1ETkrxeSrwjNiO8eHrY02HMKbQkPD60X4826yYMF0m4 FKhK/cHgdslI+Pp2pKi/nl3JJfrJ5RsGEc8Yo0IPKpW/VIBHUBiNc8Q2ajStdRKee F+WboW4YU0fURsR2y9ORzLkTaXrKiKvTczh1LlHGJFxkkF5FPp+k+dw3U1/GGxWQP efo72Vk755B1TUSx8A== X-UI-Sender-Class: f2cb72be-343f-493d-8ec3-b1efb8d6185a Received: from mail-lf1-f53.google.com ([209.85.167.53]) by smtp.mail.com (mrgmxus005 [74.208.5.15]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQxtg-1rLjGu2yZK-00UHPl for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:03:38 +0100 Received: by mail-lf1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-513d247e3c4so4705052e87.0 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:03:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywb7M6p5miJIy93b/fFT6hDk8iHdVNmmy7G4zYQLtD8EmPprhjT 80SuAycu3hOnQCL5rOApRVr7lbEBBjeFzJcdt8v1618j/igTpn7326lNHs0YjS+bBgyrLFGgcUD LFj1Z7dAiaSzIXLccwufQPn0PYKI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGkuxikRr7wbJkUPzUTHM2L1ZdtD0JNjs/shj5braNINSkBXvVmzXB7o4TdTDgbksmyxfYumbNOkP201btSbbs= X-Received: by 2002:a19:645b:0:b0:513:ccbc:e914 with SMTP id b27-20020a19645b000000b00513ccbce914mr1037152lfj.0.1710857016925; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Bill Stewart Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 08:03:09 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: GetVersionEx() depreciated, what should be used instead for Windows 7/8/10? To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c17176061403f01e" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:V4T9yyuIVYksRsL0+I4o60xI0RPUbVpDi9j/75QLvm0+xIYMTGu O3aV0nf9X34lQvUE82jTSVTSXX8S0w703UFLcsDdlLxeq+7iiq+ebulswzefzGqiZLdmsly TbxLiHdG5KNJpHKnOo8bq98i9vNAJpRVfFuzlu1yo0VTRT8bcrgQU8G/ju/bqDoC4jplNNM s7YV+sQPyzDBfpz5K27Aw== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:4OAZqiFULk4=;n8JOJmeNv4k5SLlJV+aAYxGhpqt X9EFNn/PgdKK6FzBGjptI5HzUJ04hMYlv5dvdOCcYZ+4jB/P/KmJvgavVHlLpVu9/5u1EVxi7 Twp4+7a+xHmrQwJSEB60BQ2Ai5lmRwQcDvDaB5AYyeT5TFFGBwQG2+OW9Cdv2xhwDntgEtWwY yfPrRjq9nKcU3viRSGdPbpklhwnmxgF+yGESgKY/vZYR6MfGFVJJGOGRguCmP+IN+NsU/aLoO VUDjCKlsPIx4nJQDFqleEEugJdcvNLQLneWlkUFvtiQkn0sttk9SAkeBj0zQhAQUh2XbV4+EU DBV5OTM3Yit4ABoUeMwC6hjmvT0hKQ0rGFlPwOQMOFZED9OQKhTN8i0upuQz9TP7+dTxFiAUZ pkJzy822Qb/0dLrGCr0VeUAckQ0bvTPR2rnpwmXO7cYIJEEGxSnzv7G2S/v4rVcQjbew2CnVN 06YAcyjY1ORJrvDGpv2uVMPAYS8AuF9tkxFGd0sk0bpmLRi3mMmSSnUiKPkSu1AU+Oq13f5jY kiNlhkxwXnUlLsxxB8M93a7EJuIELHppFDQppkpLtOxsYdVluTTKvxrcOKpR3JOtPKo+n7npR jt9aK5A837X+1zz9J2oOkGvkqvAZ8dOlTPE3HK94aoTqwmtopK0MioiL1K3FiTvzD7AGm+ZiF ZY2COGvJND5/ZTPpna1WwbT/MSKmULnlZC/G71iPORthcuAtFtokZOa8my42ww6Cof++8+aQl wpShoi2yWDmdb3KIULaVv4L/D7zTwx1EPBuG2wpGHiQeggATEmy0cBl34E+SW6ePdcwcd73DD fedBn8VwH0rd1IEvtnLvgKoIBtfLPbEJIOWirF8wcyaag= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --000000000000c17176061403f01e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 4:21=E2=80=AFAM Christian Franke wrote: Cygwin uses the undocumented RtlGetNtVersionNumbers() from ntdll.dll > because even RtlGetVersion() may not return the correct values. See > function wincapc::init() > > https://cygwin.com/git/?p=3Dnewlib-cygwin.git;a=3Dblob;f=3Dwinsup/cygwin/= wincap.cc > Can you please clarify the circumstances under which the RtlGetVersion function "may not return the correct values"? (I am not aware of any, hence the question.) Bill --000000000000c17176061403f01e--