From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29375 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2020 19:37:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 29356 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2020 19:37:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=OK, gratz, H*f:sk:87imjrj, H*i:sk:87imjrj X-HELO: mout.gmx.com Received: from mout.gmx.com (HELO mout.gmx.com) (74.208.4.200) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:37:28 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mail.com; s=dbd5af2cbaf7; t=1582832246; bh=j0s0oQiHqivogvPnVn0+eYSRFy38RgTpB5WdO0z3yVE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To; b=c7K2Xi8LreJTKaYqrQhdfhTRWxxCC3osp5ggVFtOeErKdlL7UKO2gxkU/+lrtMYsq BCJoUHCgJfnDCs3xSIjhdQPkG25MTXgyHlU+Yrg9jTyg1T6K3tfEIQ2yE4QNxdTzJG PB6ooN1OAw//Leh8eIN7aRte5/v5ZZfpCKTpBXjg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 214d933f-fd2f-45c7-a636-f5d79ae31a79 Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com ([209.85.208.170]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus004 [74.208.5.15]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LevsX-1jksFF1LpP-00qex7 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 20:37:26 +0100 Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id 143so544481ljj.7 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:37:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87sgiwedci.fsf@Otto.invalid> <87imjrj21y.fsf@Rainer.invalid> In-Reply-To: <87imjrj21y.fsf@Rainer.invalid> From: Bill Stewart Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANN] Cygwin-OpenSSH 8.2.2.2 To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00256.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:52 AM Achim Gratz wrote: But more to the point: since you include GPL components, a binary-only > distribution is not OK. The sources for at least the GPL licensed > utilities and libraries is missing. It's not enough to say what these > are and roughly where to get them and leave the users with figuring it > out for themselves, you are supposed to provide sources in the same way > as your binaries, for the exact version you used to create the binaries, > including any modifications to the build system or the sources > themselves. > I misunderstood, since the source is already freely available from cygwin and I am not changing any of the binaries. I can certainly include the source as a component in the installer for the next version. Bill -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple