From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-yb1-xb32.google.com (mail-yb1-xb32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b32]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E787B3858D1E for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 11:37:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E787B3858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-yb1-xb32.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-d801c83325fso696722276.0 for ; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 04:37:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694173020; x=1694777820; darn=cygwin.com; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=S9oF7F3XUcU9PTPmG82xWVt7yEjx+/W0C5o500n1f1A=; b=Cg527mZmVO+QQEkIFbdhNcuCpBCTYQ93tRGxcY0+BlQeHG1jv9c4Xz4zwAp3AY++dU iEesKHr50VoT9xdnKYgL5AfeFiI/akgJvWKJWwDB/5PwulZGlv+Ad2MP3TuSnShYuM/m UfhA68/GnPcLxxqCnckq7vUQCu4O1mM2bOMF53UNRviOhGBqiYUtRnAq8CH+QOBDCBvs h4/OOx9B36R99r74cAybyG/kJTKBdv5nny3H/dY7ZwjTG8d3RKqDz4NAgeFVsWC2sIEM qDQWNS/7dADJl389ZaPjQRKrku/d0j0zt5tm/HU93uu8Qv5taJGUcAiwqV1jLx8R1M+k O8RA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694173020; x=1694777820; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=S9oF7F3XUcU9PTPmG82xWVt7yEjx+/W0C5o500n1f1A=; b=D94Wf3A+8VyYg/9U7U3KRLGUfuoNSZYop+asnXqpNd9tp84j6TywmXI6zA41y1nJA7 t7G2mZgZhUuobdvBS2gaZRAG8xUcckrmsA+yA0Z5Zh6cw5+ZeOKXrbM4LRDwvouacVd/ ui0NSgQRuuWfBAaqlcS8hCfktThmlnwTqaACndeN/Y5JXa7ZV48xp7gx/wqND7Xxsjdk Gjr4iRMvi614mQ5FYspgcFgftdHLs46JhgQ823Q9ZYNk1H5R/pKKggVAGuRtD6ccyc0+ 1RyF6xiAI44giC7pdqo4rWEzo1Vo7dEaSqj+50EMhPfDj5g/jt+adccc7l3Xh72OBpRf kUOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwRqgolPqu7sFjPeNtRs6cSkzAIhAeYSOJEgBaTuvBN84doOShp IwiUC1KRAzZQ7+oVsA+Ysp7HkAw1x9TXtrlgewSIqH3c X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGbUuKTaCE464i1MxLkWLRHNIUL9yc6eC8eWMGe6U0o6hnaVvSULNmGFhAoQKSDU/hU6a5zdYv1/SGbBNL6ERk= X-Received: by 2002:a25:dac7:0:b0:d7b:8f3c:d7f6 with SMTP id n190-20020a25dac7000000b00d7b8f3cd7f6mr2077972ybf.43.1694173020176; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 04:37:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Matthew \"mirage335\" Hines" Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 07:36:48 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ARG_MAX missing from getconf To: cygwin@cygwin.com, Matthew mirage335 Hines Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000e45150604d765f4" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: --0000000000000e45150604d765f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok, I guess that makes sense. My worry was some './configure' script determining that the build environment is somehow not 'sane'. At least for the limited set of programs that I use under cygwin, I have set up my CI to now watch for changes in which binaries are present. Nothing obviously significant in that history so far. At this point, from comparing with my previous CI results, I am guessing this doesn't affect me, aside from adding an exception to my test case for this specifically. Might be better to get closer to the usual Linux behavior I am familiar with, of a much higher, valid, ARG_MAX value. On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 6:49=E2=80=AFAM Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Sep 8 00:14, Matthew "mirage335" Hines via Cygwin wrote: > > Really hope other Cygwin packages will not be broken because 'ARG_MAX' = is > > now undefined in 'getconf' output. Caught this in a CI test for a rather > > large shell script. > > > > > https://github.com/mirage335-colossus/ubiquitous_bash/blob/master/structu= re/installation.sh#L385 > > Please read this, this is supposed to explain the new ARG_MAX > behaviour sufficiently: > > https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2023-August/254352.html > > > Corinna > --0000000000000e45150604d765f4--