From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65EF03858D37 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 15:20:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 65EF03858D37 Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id 133so8849176pfx.11 for ; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 07:20:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=h/CPHlMQGvN+ywvBehYKjwx41ycvpAyGzdig/+CCJ7U=; b=CQMeyjR9LFLDRQu5kFZeSg61rESnDO2UZUTJTQ5/4Gd+XpiXqLZwgMSGrqfngyz7zZ giWWVokFaJ46+G9Om0CTYkr4TFMvfvxdQcSa3p6A3K9yJIbK22upD9rjhgPBKN8EfeWn xMunXqSJ3ApJnaR1jkupEv3+3MFSCx0DFhgI7tKh2ZVLtVohawYYa+Y1BLWjiihNe/zr oJZXUL0k3EMbohjsMvazrlhg8ou2DQzLSIsYQKVLgrBpAefWleeJGGIxA/m4OUPiaY+/ zRjhaotJYaJqbk810KubCC+BKz6jRocIRil4RDL00+sH2JJ+3ViQrVM5umAgxn7m5BHy m+lQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532sQo5QHqlVsEqauC+QWF8zoqdplAXxVf/fW2tyXmOCLRYZ+XUS fV+astDEOp5garKuxTpYJGNtxgLSWmrL9lsoqvJulxsu X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz3of4eHMSuPPMc0iKVwpUh2IrcdjzEoP7ioM5DVCeyajAGSPPPXD1QWqugCX6FQJeYOUHZrChvL6Z5XkM4G+8= X-Received: by 2002:a62:6dc1:0:b029:15d:d9c2:f8b9 with SMTP id i184-20020a626dc10000b029015dd9c2f8b9mr17909547pfc.46.1604244031383; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 07:20:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201101090012.GA3058@dimstar.local.net> In-Reply-To: <20201101090012.GA3058@dimstar.local.net> From: Stephen John Smoogen Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 10:20:20 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cygwin-64 on W10-64 : the only game in town? To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 15:20:54 -0000 On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 at 04:02, Duncan Roe wrote: > On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 08:49:23AM +0000, cygwin wrote: > > With W7 no longer supported, W10-32 supported but no longer provided on > > new machines (Microsoft states that, "Beginning with Windows 10, version > > 2004, all new Windows 10 systems will be required to use 64-bit builds > > and Microsoft will no longer release 32-bit builds for OEM distribution > > .. the weaker version of Windows 10 has several limitations, like > > capping out at 3.2GB of RAM and less stringent security measures") and > > the functionality of Cygwin-32 significantly downplayed on Cygwin's own > > Home page, that really does leave Cygwin-64 on W10-64 on 64-bit hardware > > as the sole recommended platform. Yes? > > > > -- > No, I run Cygwin64 on Win 7. There is an outstanding W7 update, it > appeared a > few weeks ago, but I'm not taking it. > > The question is nuanced around "what is the recommended platform". Now as individuals we can recommend anything we want if it works for us.. but we also aren't expecting to answer all of Fergus's questions when he tries to get Cygwin working on his system. I think in the end, for the project, the recommendation would be whatever Corinna recommends as she is the primary author of the code these days and the one who would be fixing problems found. -- Stephen J Smoogen.