From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jan.nijtmans@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2037C385B831
 for <cygwin@cygwin.com>; Mon,  6 Apr 2020 10:07:58 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2037C385B831
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id f3so5071501ioj.1
 for <cygwin@cygwin.com>; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 03:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=mDU2IkdYiEvNO8/Qy3J881CZOYROOZhQsuIolafakXI=;
 b=PfDd7/84QB8hlakzGqLhj5q0sexoOhRgk0tnxiWBDP3/VmXw2pd7wMBnSB80yEdWmc
 Ru4c1bflxMj1Ti2red1PZJQ88a5WE1h0LoKetmXvcbqQn+HhDE3M/CJKAJlZbCqctRON
 PQBSU7pgcGfpB+d0Szr+NgqcJJtWU16/BNuXML/FDnyFJguoCyrDpfP+9lupo+/M3fUy
 +mmVpt5UmqPV+ZWS8RhDuLWZwPlhPuFomHFcgXmtmn4mvsL3cijut0nAP51CiZ6uaMmf
 iuoIF1mnS6+M1vajBlvRr0ltnOEbqpqTkZJzWyUiaua1SR4yX6erInJJXBVZUY+qReGf
 SQQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZA2vjD0+WzHLS7BUA0e066yuFCYlGaWjTACI2PHKP18YPW2RAJ
 nFI0XPJg7dqC+wwvU2BhHYzY7zAJASoq2vLBPmCEHoUn5Dk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ7oA05dNLTmWNyqHjbmQFWF3xmhJycG1wGJ9DNyC9yxyQoQ+t1tb6Egvf8Y630OmnI4DhyWG4zmORvPwMUhto=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:fa12:: with SMTP id p18mr18687761ioh.46.1586167677301; 
 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 03:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAXzdLWXD09FkgTmo2FY0kH4NmyYeAu9gnQaarkwYxKjYjOx3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO1jNwvJsgL92nOdyTMfdL8_Rj211o=T3Aro=6PouDoM_T+X7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO1jNwvJsgL92nOdyTMfdL8_Rj211o=T3Aro=6PouDoM_T+X7g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jan Nijtmans <jan.nijtmans@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:07:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CAO1jNwtsZ_2JzydqvavfbNzn_xh-noU8EXSNG_xdrH_7fdt5=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Problem in mingw64-i686-binutils [Was: Updated:
 binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1 (x86/x86_64)]
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request@cygwin.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:07:59 -0000

Ping.

Would it be possible to release a version of mingw64-i686-binutils with the
same patch as done for binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1? I suspect
this would resolve the problem described here.

Thanks!
       Jan Nijtmans

Op wo 1 apr. 2020 om 13:33 schreef Jan Nijtmans <jan.nijtmans@gmail.com>:
>
> > The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
> >
> > * binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe
> >
> > This release should fix libtool shared library builds on 32bit Cygwin.
>
> When building latest Tcl/Tk 8.6.10 on Cygwin and Win32, I noted that
> on mingw64-i686 the built executables crash immediately. Reverting
> mingw64-i686-binutils from version 2.34-1 back to version
> 2.13.1.be46fa23-1 makes the build work again.
>
> So, it looks like binutils for mingw64 (32-bit only) has the same
> problem as the Cygwin-32 version.
>
> Would it be possible to re-build mingw64-i686-binutils with
> the same patch?
>
> Regards,
>     Jan Nijtmans