From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29520 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2012 18:13:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 29512 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2012 18:13:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_CG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-gg0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-gg0-f171.google.com) (209.85.161.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:12:57 +0000 Received: by ggmi1 with SMTP id i1so4456344ggm.2 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:12:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.66.88.39 with SMTP id bd7mr9802050pab.50.1342807975748; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.5.229 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:12:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120720174819.GA2064@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> References: <20120720170423.GA850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20120720174819.GA2064@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rebaseall invocation error From: Mirko Vukovic To: cygwin@cygwin.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:36:07PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >>Problem fixed ... see below >> >>On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Christopher Faylor >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 01:00:45PM -0400, Mirko Vukovic wrote: >>>>Hello, >>>> >>>>I am running rebaseall manually to enable X11: I found a post >>>>suggesting to rebase to 0x77000000 >>>> >>>>I am following instructions on http://cygwin.wikia.com/wiki/Rebaseall >>> >>> You realize that the project web site is: http://cygwin.com/ right? You >>> can't expect instructions from unrelated sites to work. You shouldn't >>> need to use the above anymore with new improvements to reabase. >> >>True. But I did not find anything else better and the instructions on >>that site jibed with what I read on the cygwin mailing list over the >>years. That's why I went with it. > > But this wasn't actually "better". Just running rebaseall, as suggested > by the official Cygwin FAQ is the correct advice. > I agree > cgf > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple