public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Dinwoodie <Adam.Dinwoodie@metaswitch.com>
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: How to keep a dependency from [continually] appearing in setup
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A43654F23@ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50197B86.9060308@cornell.edu>

Ken Brown wrote:
>On 8/1/2012 10:18 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>> It can be argued that emacs-auctex should not pull in texlive. Most
>> users installing emacs-auctex will already have some flavor of tex in
>> place, and not necessarily the cygwin one (like the OP, or perhaps a
>> MikTex user). Plus, the error message is pretty intuitive and the
>> solution very simple, if latex is not there: "latex: no such command"
>> ==> "maybe I should install latex." Therefore, the expected aggregate
>
>There's more to it than that.  emacs-auctex installs stuff needed for
>its preview feature in /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/preview/.  This won't
>be found by native texlive or by MikTeX.
>
>> frustration of users who installed auctex without latex available would
>> likely be far lower than the aggregate frustration of users wanting to
>> install auctex and getting saddled with an unwanted redundant texlive
>> distribution (for which there is no easy solution).
>
>Why is this so frustrating?  It doesn't do any harm (except waste a
>small amount of disk space) to install Cygwin's texlive in parallel with
>native texlive.  Just make sure the bin directory of the latter precedes
>/usr/bin in PATH.  I myself have both installed, since I sometimes find
>it useful for testing purposes to be able to switch from one to the
>other (by temporarily changing PATH).

I'd draw a parallel between the emacs-auctex's dependency on latex and libX11's
dependency on xorg-server: while xorg-server is certainly the preferred X
server for Cygwin, it's not the only option[0].

[0]: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-02/msg00602.html

I've no particular preference for whether one package includes another that is
a "soft" dependency, but I do think it's important to maintain consistency.
Either dependencies where some users are likely to want to use non-Cygwin tools
should be installed regardless, or they should not, and that should be applied
across the board.

Inconsistency harms least astonishment, and harming least astonishment makes me
very sad.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-02  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-30  5:33 Wynfield Henman
2012-07-31 22:07 ` Ken Brown
2012-08-01 12:05   ` Ryan Johnson
2012-08-01 13:13     ` Ken Brown
2012-08-01 14:18       ` Ryan Johnson
2012-08-01 16:50         ` Achim Gratz
2012-08-01 18:58         ` Ken Brown
2012-08-02 11:28           ` Adam Dinwoodie [this message]
2012-08-02 12:14             ` Ryan Johnson
2012-08-02 13:19               ` Adam Dinwoodie
2012-08-02 13:40             ` Ken Brown
2012-08-02 14:02               ` Ryan Johnson
2012-08-02 14:53             ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A43654F23@ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk \
    --to=adam.dinwoodie@metaswitch.com \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).