From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cygwin-return-179704-listarch-cygwin=sourceware.org@cygwin.com>
Received: (qmail 4532 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2012 15:52:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 4521 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Aug 2012 15:52:22 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_YG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from enficsets1.metaswitch.com (HELO ENFICSETS1.metaswitch.com) (192.91.191.38)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:52:09 +0000
Received: from ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk (172.18.10.94) by ENFICSETS1.metaswitch.com (172.18.4.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.298.4; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:51:47 +0100
Received: from ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::b06d:4d13:5f63:3715]) by ENFICSMBX1.datcon.co.uk ([fe80::d5d5:c683:a3be:3a19%18]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:52:07 +0100
From: Adam Dinwoodie <Adam.Dinwoodie@metaswitch.com>
To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: RE: Please test snapshots
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 17:46:00 -0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:50:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A496019FE@ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk>
References: <50203227.50207@dancol.org> <50205E0E.3060406@dancol.org> <20120808215909.GA29761@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <loom.20120809T111739-607@post.gmane.org> <5023CF06.2030006@dancol.org> <loom.20120810T082432-17@post.gmane.org> <20120810142515.GE11601@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A49600037@ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk> <20120816183738.GA16914@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <CE9C056E12502146A72FD81290379E9A49601815@ENFIRHMBX1.datcon.co.uk> <20120817142506.GB20284@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20120817142506.GB20284@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@cygwin.com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com
X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00425.txt.bz2

Christopher Faylor wrote
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 09:07:30AM +0000, Adam Dinwoodie wrote:
>> I'm still seeing exactly the same issue having taken the 20120816 snapsh=
ot.
>> If anything, I've been hitting the problem more.
>
> I should have asked this before:  I don't think anyone has made it clear =
if
> they are running the cygwin ping or the Windows one.  I've been assuming
> Cygwin.  Is that correct?

Yes, Cygwin ping. For paranoia's sake, you can check the output I pasted in=
 my
previous email, which should look like Cygwin ping rather than Windows ping
output. Also:

    $ cygcheck -c ping
    Cygwin Package Information
    Package              Version        Status
    ping                 1.0-1          OK

    $ cygcheck -f $(which ping)
    ping-1.0-1

    $ which ping
    /usr/bin/ping

    $ cygcheck ping
    Found: C:\cygwin\bin\ping.exe
    Found: C:\Windows\system32\ping.exe
    C:\cygwin\bin\ping.exe
      C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll
        C:\Windows\system32\KERNEL32.dll
          C:\Windows\system32\API-MS-Win-Core-RtlSupport-L1-1-0.dll
          C:\Windows\system32\ntdll.dll
            ...blah blah blah...

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple