From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41868 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2016 14:06:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 41856 invoked by uid 89); 11 Nov 2016 14:06:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=i686x86_64, i686,x86_64, mingw64, announcement X-HELO: COL004-OMC4S15.hotmail.com Received: from col004-omc4s15.hotmail.com (HELO COL004-OMC4S15.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.217) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:06:34 +0000 Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.34.200]) by COL004-OMC4S15.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 06:06:33 -0800 Received: from BN3NAM04FT049.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.92.60) by BN3NAM04HT091.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.93.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.707.3; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:06:32 +0000 Received: from CY1PR0201MB0796.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.92.58) by BN3NAM04FT049.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.93.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.707.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:06:31 +0000 Received: from CY1PR0201MB0796.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.141.21]) by CY1PR0201MB0796.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.141.21]) with mapi id 15.01.0707.013; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:06:32 +0000 From: Tony Kelman To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-gcc-5.4.0-3 (x86/x86_64) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: authentication-results: cygwin.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cygwin.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=kelman.net; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:;UpperCasedChecksum:;SizeAsReceived:7409;Count:39 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [nMl+dnbbGzz0YlYktCBONzZfdVkWS2Yy] x-incomingheadercount: 39 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;BN3NAM04HT091;7:5hYpSMB/G+avFm8XMuYTo8I8sD0g8x+2vGYSr7fZPeAw7Mjz0qJYYLHfSzWynhvPZzCxTlAvsjXILNci7cMSXJ8Hcf3maxAf58yRgOhiQBSRKlbai/rik60CY+0PUnG91M773K7O7dwdKWbhc+fKzIYRmIYb8ck3U333V3asAo+4kkZ1ABuzgygega0wSmAoUTnWYKfh1QHXAjtsb/JCSdjw+S01zRhRQike3HX68VxnxSuWCBTkTqzLcWzHOwGM3+qKkaxUSS3CA8CO+wE1hQzTfvBTL+1OKh0A7FhN+h8mRfl01A2owXqb33vwf7H3wOy6FqvuB0j1xMMkLqlRpcvhcaaOYluHkYrXD/RfWhU= x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(98900003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BN3NAM04HT091;H:CY1PR0201MB0796.namprd02.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 588eb094-ea5b-439d-5733-08d40a3bf08d x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001)(1601124038)(1603103113)(1603101340)(1601125047);SRVR:BN3NAM04HT091; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(432015012)(82015046);SRVR:BN3NAM04HT091;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3NAM04HT091; x-forefront-prvs: 012349AD1C spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Nov 2016 14:06:31.8653 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3NAM04HT091 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00119.txt.bz2 > I have just updated the mingw-w64 cross compilers Cygwin 32bit and > 64bit to mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-gcc-5.4.0-3. Hi Jon, What will be left as prev? 5.4.0-2, or the last 4.9 build? Can you help raise https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D77333? The interprocedural analysis that was added for gcc 5 is deeply buggy on mingw targets, resulting in miscompiling C++ libraries like LLVM. This is keeping me on gcc 4 indefinitely until it gets fixed. I may have to abandon gcc and switch to clang due to this, but there are many libraries that have broken build systems that behave incorrectly when you try to use clang on Windows. I'll use time machine if that's my only way to keep getting gcc 4, but this bug in gcc should really be fixed or it's going to start showing up in cygwin-mingw-cross and msys2 packages. Thanks, Tony -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple