* RE: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
@ 2002-12-05 6:46 Richard Campbell
2002-12-05 6:57 ` Max Bowsher
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Richard Campbell @ 2002-12-05 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
>Impractical. As I said, almost 100% of people won't want 100% of packages.
It might be interesting to poll in some way, considering how often this
comes up. I suspect more than "almost 0%" might want a 1-button,
overnight-style install.
>Frankly, this odd method only makes the slightest sense in your unusual
>situation (downloads constricted by number of files not file size).
I have every package selected, and as new packages appear I install
them.
>tetex ? (Document processing system)
>lilypond ? (Sheet music production)
>
>Both multi-megabyte packages for very specialized requirements.
Got them both. Haven't used either yet, but if I want to they are
installed and up to date.
-Richard Campbell.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
2002-12-05 6:46 [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ? Richard Campbell
@ 2002-12-05 6:57 ` Max Bowsher
2002-12-05 8:18 ` Brian Gallew
2002-12-05 14:20 ` [Mingw-users] Cygwin " Robert Collins
2 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Max Bowsher @ 2002-12-05 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Campbell, cygwin
Richard Campbell <richard.campbell@air2web.com> wrote:
>> Impractical. As I said, almost 100% of people won't want 100% of
>> packages.
>
> It might be interesting to poll in some way, considering how often
> this comes up. I suspect more than "almost 0%" might want a 1-button,
> overnight-style install.
This doesn't require one big archive. There is nothing stopping anyone with
a slow but flat rate connection from running setup, choosing everything, and
letting it get on with it.
>> Frankly, this odd method only makes the slightest sense in your
>> unusual situation (downloads constricted by number of files not file
>> size).
>
> I have every package selected, and as new packages appear I install
> them.
>
>> tetex ? (Document processing system)
>> lilypond ? (Sheet music production)
>>
>> Both multi-megabyte packages for very specialized requirements.
>
> Got them both. Haven't used either yet, but if I want to they are
> installed and up to date.
I have everything downloaded and kept up to date (but not installed). But at
no point would one big archive have been useful to me.
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
2002-12-05 6:46 [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ? Richard Campbell
2002-12-05 6:57 ` Max Bowsher
@ 2002-12-05 8:18 ` Brian Gallew
2002-12-05 9:20 ` news
[not found] ` <200212051653.gB5GrrP09822@mx1.redhat.com>
2002-12-05 14:20 ` [Mingw-users] Cygwin " Robert Collins
2 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Brian Gallew @ 2002-12-05 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
Richard Campbell said:
> It might be interesting to poll in some way, considering how often
> this comes up. I suspect more than "almost 0%" might want a
> 1-button, overnight-style install.
This is the way I work. I have everything installed except emacs (I
built/installed Xemacs long before FSF-emacs was available). Every
morning before I start my work day I re-run setup to be sure I have
the most current release of everything. Periodically I'll check with
setup to see if I'm missing any other packages.
Disk is cheap. Network bandwidth is cheap. Not being able to do
something because I failed to download a tool is annoying.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
2002-12-05 6:46 [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ? Richard Campbell
2002-12-05 6:57 ` Max Bowsher
2002-12-05 8:18 ` Brian Gallew
@ 2002-12-05 14:20 ` Robert Collins
2002-12-05 15:39 ` [FAQ?] " Charles Wilson
2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Robert Collins @ 2002-12-05 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Campbell; +Cc: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1349 bytes --]
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 01:39, Richard Campbell wrote:
> >Impractical. As I said, almost 100% of people won't want 100% of packages.
>
> It might be interesting to poll in some way, considering how often this
> comes up. I suspect more than "almost 0%" might want a 1-button,
> overnight-style install.
I agree with you with regards to what folk may want. The modular install
is about choice and efficiency. There is *no* reason that a 1-button
overnight-style install cannot be achieved using setup.exe. Patches
accepted gratefully.
With regards to having a monolithic download however...
Some back-of-a-postcard sums:
monolithic install
577MB install.
1 update to a package a week,
1 new 577MB install file created each week.
longest period without updating - 2 months.
this would mean an average of ~280MB per month downloading updates.
modular install
577MB total download size
1 update to a package a week,
1 new modular install (avg ~5MB) created each week.
longest period without updated - 2 months.
this would mean an average of ~20MB per month downloading updates.
Seems pretty clear to me, that for anyone on a slow link, or anyone
charged by volume, that the modular install is much more efficient.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [FAQ?] Re: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
2002-12-05 14:20 ` [Mingw-users] Cygwin " Robert Collins
@ 2002-12-05 15:39 ` Charles Wilson
2002-12-05 15:55 ` Robert Collins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Charles Wilson @ 2002-12-05 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Collins; +Cc: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
Robert Collins wrote:
> Some back-of-a-postcard sums:
>
> monolithic install
> 577MB install.
> 1 update to a package a week,
> 1 new 577MB install file created each week.
> longest period without updating - 2 months.
>
> this would mean an average of ~280MB per month downloading updates.
>
>
> modular install
> 577MB total download size
> 1 update to a package a week,
> 1 new modular install (avg ~5MB) created each week.
> longest period without updated - 2 months.
>
> this would mean an average of ~20MB per month downloading updates.
>
> Seems pretty clear to me, that for anyone on a slow link, or anyone
> charged by volume, that the modular install is much more efficient.
Faulty analogy. Most users would probably only download the monolithic
tarball once, for their initial installation. Then use setup.exe and
update things in a modular fashion after that.
Mebbe the FAQ could include "Can't I just download all of cygwin at one
time without using setup?"
Sure. The easiest way is to get this (native windows) GUI port of wget:
http://www.jensroesner.de/wgetgui/ (The GUI)
which needs
http://space.tin.it/computer/hherold/ (the actual wget binary + ssl
libraries)
[disclaimer: the software referenced here is not part of cygwin, not
supported by us, talk to the authors of the programs if you have
problems, yadda yadda yadda]
Install 'em, run the GUI ....
--------
If somebody (David?) writes up this FAQ, check
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg00600.html and
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-07/msg00595.html for more detailed
info on this GPL'ed software and step-by-step "click here, type this
there" instructions for using wGetGui to grab cygwin.
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [FAQ?] Re: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
2002-12-05 15:39 ` [FAQ?] " Charles Wilson
@ 2002-12-05 15:55 ` Robert Collins
2002-12-05 16:32 ` Charles Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Robert Collins @ 2002-12-05 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charles Wilson; +Cc: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1146 bytes --]
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 10:30, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > Seems pretty clear to me, that for anyone on a slow link, or anyone
> > charged by volume, that the modular install is much more efficient.
>
> Faulty analogy. Most users would probably only download the monolithic
> tarball once, for their initial installation. Then use setup.exe and
> update things in a modular fashion after that.
I'm not about to actively maintain two forms of setup that are so
different. And until someone offers to do that, I think it is a
reasonable assumption to make that the install form you start with you
continue with.
Also, I supported having a 'install-in-one-hit-everything' in setup
earlier in my email, where you did not quote.
Now, for grabbing everything at once, there are many ways:
wget ~= setup ~= winwget ~= ftp mget ~= tool foo
and they are *all* orthogonal to the monolithic download discussion.
I'm trying to highlight the weakness's with a monolithic download, not
the pros and cons of a full-install strategy.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [FAQ?] Re: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
2002-12-05 15:55 ` Robert Collins
@ 2002-12-05 16:32 ` Charles Wilson
2002-12-05 18:33 ` Robert Collins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Charles Wilson @ 2002-12-05 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Collins; +Cc: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
Robert Collins wrote:
>
> I'm not about to actively maintain two forms of setup that are so
> different. And until someone offers to do that, I think it is a
> reasonable assumption to make that the install form you start with you
> continue with.
Errmm...I musta missed something. I wasn't suggesting you do any such
thing.
> Also, I supported having a 'install-in-one-hit-everything' in setup
> earlier in my email, where you did not quote.
Right, it wasn't germane to the "how the heck can I **download**
everything" problem. Setup, as we all know, is NOT a generic mirroring
tool.
> Now, for grabbing everything at once, there are many ways:
> wget ~= setup ~= winwget ~= ftp mget ~= tool foo
> and they are *all* orthogonal to the monolithic download discussion.
Sortof. I assumed <i>a priori</i> that a 557MB tarball is a bad idea.
It was discussed in one of the two messages I posted a link to. IIRC
this whole thread started because somebody wanted to download the whole
cygwin schlmeil in order to *inspect* the binaries or sources; not to
install it. And he didn't relish an afternoon's worth of point-n-click.
> I'm trying to highlight the weakness's with a monolithic download, not
> the pros and cons of a full-install strategy.
I thought "installation" wasn't the issue ANYWAY. It was just
*downloading*. It's a given that we are NOT going to make 600MB
tarballs, or daily-updated .iso's. So, how to solve the original
poster's problem (and address the somewhat squirrelly issue of modem users)?
I suggested using a a reasonable fascimile of a mirroring tool (e.g.
wget, plus a GUI for the cmdline-challenged) to handle the *download*.
I didn't say (because I thought it was obvious) that IF one wanted to
actually install cygwin -- which was NOT the case for the original
poster who started this thread, I think -- you'd use setup.exe and point
it at the nice local collection of files wget downloaded for you. And
then for updates, you'd point setup.exe back to the normal mirrors.
I was not, in any way, suggesting that setup learn how to parse a cygwin
"installation" created by some moron unzipping a bunch of tarballs by
hand. No way. Never.
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* RE: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
@ 2002-12-05 6:57 Richard Campbell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Richard Campbell @ 2002-12-05 6:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
>>> Impractical. As I said, almost 100% of people won't want 100% of
>>> packages.
>
>This doesn't require one big archive. There is nothing stopping anyone with
>a slow but flat rate connection from running setup, choosing everything,
and
>letting it get on with it.
No argument. I was just addressing the
"100% of people not wanting 100% of packages" side.
-Richard Campbell.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ?
@ 2002-12-03 18:46 Dockeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Dockeen @ 2002-12-03 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
I wonder if folks who ask this question fully realize the meaning of
"Minimal"
im MingW. The binary for MingW is about 12 megabytes at last glance.
Cygwin,
the full package runs many 100's of Megabytes. So a single archive is
plainly
untenable. The nature of Cygwin is flexible, so the setup allows you to
load
just what *you* need. So, there is logic and reason in the way Cygwin does
things. There is logic and reason in the way MingW does things. There is
even logic and reason in the fact that those methods are very different.
Wayne
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20021203225751.DFCA.GNIPI@windows-sucks.com>]
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-06 1:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-12-05 6:46 [Mingw-users] Cygwin Full download in one big archive ? Richard Campbell
2002-12-05 6:57 ` Max Bowsher
2002-12-05 8:18 ` Brian Gallew
2002-12-05 9:20 ` news
[not found] ` <200212051653.gB5GrrP09822@mx1.redhat.com>
2002-12-05 14:18 ` [Mingw-users] cygwin " Christopher Faylor
2002-12-05 14:20 ` [Mingw-users] Cygwin " Robert Collins
2002-12-05 15:39 ` [FAQ?] " Charles Wilson
2002-12-05 15:55 ` Robert Collins
2002-12-05 16:32 ` Charles Wilson
2002-12-05 18:33 ` Robert Collins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-05 6:57 Richard Campbell
2002-12-03 18:46 Dockeen
[not found] <20021203225751.DFCA.GNIPI@windows-sucks.com>
2002-12-03 14:06 ` Max Bowsher
[not found] ` <20021204124607.DFC8.GNIPI@windows-sucks.com>
2002-12-04 9:49 ` Max Bowsher
[not found] ` <20021204233455.0A3D.GNIPI@windows-sucks.com>
2002-12-04 16:34 ` Max Bowsher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).