From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 75694 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2016 10:10:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 75678 invoked by uid 89); 24 Sep 2016 10:10:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:namprd02, H*p:D*net, Tony, anybody X-HELO: COL004-OMC3S5.hotmail.com Received: from col004-omc3s5.hotmail.com (HELO COL004-OMC3S5.hotmail.com) (65.55.34.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:10:44 +0000 Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.34.135]) by COL004-OMC3S5.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sat, 24 Sep 2016 03:10:43 -0700 Received: from BN3NAM01FT036.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.66.51) by BN3NAM01HT035.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.66.235) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.629.5; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:10:42 +0000 Received: from DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.66.53) by BN3NAM01FT036.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.67.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.629.5 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:10:42 +0000 Received: from DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.95.145]) by DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.95.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0629.017; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:10:42 +0000 From: Tony Kelman To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" Subject: Re: Advice for debugging heap mismatches? (Win10 Insider build 14926) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 13:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 10.152.66.53) smtp.mailfrom=kelman.net; cygwin.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cygwin.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=kelman.net; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kelman.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [IZOGtKLiHCCGswSwIEofLpRZ/p+ay/lW] x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;BN3NAM01HT035;6:KJL6bEa/A3k4O5BhjYeUIa84eVPbnvOdew8MB8eCrG8TiFpCVX7MgRzC8JclVeIo7keYoprDZBeOr156IfRmQMakaT0A0Jq+K4JZah2cwnKJboNvgg7pIulgj5Ylbax/BvAHQ/LfVklG4oyER5VRh4AC5TOU7HOcxWO6NqKJBpMHNlvmDShFUQsaDYuYXq8Hr87xrt1LTJN5oRwiBWUqL9nssYiLC7HOr2M/ef3r6+O9MegGZeD29+HJlwvkQG0ezn1rxDUO7nH7wwNtyInam0dOG4fcl4W1Oup5lbtboHA=;5:CN8FPjzL98RSgu03hc20vWb/Ru2hrWxle9/FisZi5GYCAbDXg2Kz26k6SHEOQrv604DG1tjdhkWR6hqYljaVp+UkYP74i5wnqHBLGX62SBP7Ptwtx6vhgKhowT5PH+23dbtpX90mCG3RUnylMNhwJQ==;24:pln8FaTb1zHZb8QZsA5br2P787FiCG9oI74MdhbzGO4CSHCSK0jaxPYvTWZY0YcljUtxTWHkcs+ERIH+3mYxAS+W5aXts9r4mAZKYyAwvqQ=;7:WiRMjUaOaKGKbgBWkaLLv5Xt6T6NGavwZB3silxvb/PF7Kv1LYbx/AsXkgs/pFNC0h6BWEviZuSkBUrOv5vjwfp+qdHqmeoekSm2Y/P2U4W60iT0o0BVn6fp3BpF27VAs10Un1VCocvxwJEWyUActtoCN2xudmsZwyZQGQ0aoMsgn7lQezU5bMxIYNGI15/LBRDOagRd6BDB3E16hw3/pLWux4laWkIFD8AKDuaeEIxwWwjuFUiK7Y8iCu4nl18Tl85ZpAM6C7SHQlQ7E2foEJnnwXL4JnVrmS3wUIyYVK9ZsllUeh7AsXtuGLfSRjVA x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(98900003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:BN3NAM01HT035;H:DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0df65244-c378-4fb6-3a43-08d3e4630a9b x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(1601124038)(1603103081)(1601125047);SRVR:BN3NAM01HT035; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(432015012)(82015046);SRVR:BN3NAM01HT035;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3NAM01HT035; x-forefront-prvs: 0075CB064E spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Sep 2016 10:10:41.9651 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3NAM01HT035 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00314.txt.bz2 > I've tried manually rebasing, setting rebase-trigger, rerunning latest > setup, rebooting, etc. During big parallel makes none of the above helped > with getting rid of intermittent heap mismatch errors during fork after I > upgraded to Windows 10 Insider build 14926. I had been on the Insider fast > ring for a few months Anybody? Just checked 14931 and it has the same problem. I'll be switching back the slow ring as soon as it lets me, but I'm about to start getting "build will expire" popups. -Tony -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple