From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29990 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2016 06:57:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 29938 invoked by uid 89); 3 Oct 2016 06:57:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:namprd02, H*p:D*net, H*r:15.01.0649.021, Hx-spam-relays-external:15.01.0649.021 X-HELO: BAY004-OMC3S3.hotmail.com Received: from bay004-omc3s3.hotmail.com (HELO BAY004-OMC3S3.hotmail.com) (65.54.190.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 06:57:17 +0000 Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.54.190.189]) by BAY004-OMC3S3.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 2 Oct 2016 23:57:16 -0700 Received: from CO1NAM04FT020.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.56) by CO1NAM04HT046.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.91.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.629.5; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 06:57:14 +0000 Received: from DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.90.54) by CO1NAM04FT020.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.90.63) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.629.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 06:57:13 +0000 Received: from DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.95.145]) by DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.95.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0649.021; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 06:57:13 +0000 From: Tony Kelman To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" Subject: Re: Advice for debugging heap mismatches? (Win10 Insider build 14926) Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <57E700EA.2040802@maxrnd.com> <87r37z3ql8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> ,<87intaeyco.fsf@Rainer.invalid> In-Reply-To: <87intaeyco.fsf@Rainer.invalid> authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is 10.152.90.54) smtp.mailfrom=kelman.net; cygwin.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cygwin.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=kelman.net; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: kelman.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [L24X87geSBt3f58NkNm5xRNvx/fri1+c] x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;CO1NAM04HT046;6:Dsr5VzLrX2nCbDjGhTnXVctAUAGqW4G22u3XtTJqsnWQ6cB9bthGln2erCAFKkF5Q4OWfK/AJcHtpHEzI11EaLvsedMxpHLG7O2NkFQ2KGSSQSAypsWfRM2Z9R4v8knKP51FxWw+mqHqHL4coAUYTp9rBs6h7AtvSlf1vEDO2pZn4DSDH8VFJrSb0phCYD00A1lJNnisDmcIjcPZvgp4YQ+JF/OrmB/f8zuKuSduZUCnJVmybTwrs+ze3HdeiYtDr+I0P5Zc3wbqb0uOmT/Ehd3t4fDiUj0mg0xSYE196YA=;5:odKIZ58vaZMgNTW7ZXN+sV+zPHo08c2ioI9nsQ65zg6t3SfxHoz/EsSYoSUayhHaIFUWSUZeJPALSvqnt1Dc8uM/Rpxt7CRd6SIFoajtaC1o0pL99YB0q9KKDq1kfXeRolOGHTE4N8iMCCkfjlQwCw==;24:YqISgHFT5u2qa0EZfD7Aczm4HwtuF0xHNC1d6xKlsuMQqjn+nkUMhL+DPke0EyB2sqKWl8Z97CHwaoT7fD2loQ44mRFXLxBEyzqevDwMqKU=;7:h6dUSiRfWU+zmQVTmSjvpVmUSrG1snHwHj5pIW7y726ZeDXIihDanc/2Xojc9YlXvyu8IvXOIcY/3jiXewWCiHZYhFnqxpqmg7JA6Ara9QKlEY90KTJE2+SeAaaTA1qIb6Zk7pyEn1RKMjEFz2d0VZK34CzIb0c/aRL7r14rUMZNqgdEpTkllXeye7DD1VlZSLLnxuB+zlcaQuyEm/ek8JQ0SkByqajNwF1IVBeulwv6AckBnvUrNVAsBL9PuAjBL/jemH3o8RAPd29BpPM6YH5w6Po1w/j+DTG8eLcDu2A7xB75eF9txmCwfsZBFZdH x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(98900003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:CO1NAM04HT046;H:DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6990688b-550f-496c-9b70-08d3eb5a812e x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(1601124038)(1603103081)(1601125047);SRVR:CO1NAM04HT046; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(432015012)(82015046);SRVR:CO1NAM04HT046;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CO1NAM04HT046; x-forefront-prvs: 008421A8FF spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Oct 2016 06:57:13.3809 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO1NAM04HT046 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 > No, that looks like I'd expect it to. You need to look at the process > map when you have fork problems, since the problem seems to be > intermittent. How so? Something like for i in `seq 1000`; do cat /proc/self/maps > procselfmaps_`date +%s.%N`.txt; done & before running the problematic command? It does take a variable amount of time to trigger, and sometimes exhibits as a complete freeze instead of an error. What should I be looking for here? > Have you tried to play around with the virus scanner settings? I already have a Windows Defender exclusion for my Cygwin installs. Turning off real-time protection temporarily didn't help. > One sure-fire way to make sure your 32-bit E: installation is not causing= havoc > with your 64-bit C: installation is to temporarily rename E:\cygwin32 to > E:\somethingelse and retry your build. This should not be necessary but = I don't > know what else to suggest. Good idea. Tried it, didn't help. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple