public inbox for cygwin@cygwin.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]" <lavr@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov>
To: "'cygwin@cygwin.com'" <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Subject: poll() is buggy for duplicate file descriptors inquired for different events
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 17:04:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM8PR09MB7095D0733CD9A00FC0847434A5B69@DM8PR09MB7095.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> (raw)

Hi,

It looks like if a file descriptor is inquired a few times in a poll() call with different events (and for one of those events the file descriptor is "ready"),
only that occurrence gets reported correctly, and all other occurrences get the returned event just "copied over" (and thus, it may be incompatible with the
query for that occurrence).

The following simple test case demonstrates this:

$ cat poll.c 
#include <poll.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>

int main()
{
    int n;
    struct pollfd pfd[2];
    memset(pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd));

    pfd[0].fd = 1;
    pfd[0].events = POLLOUT;
    pfd[1].fd = 1;
    pfd[1].events = POLLIN;
    
    n = poll(pfd, 2, 1000);
    printf("n = %d\n"
    "[0].fd = %d\n"
    "[0].event = %d\n"
    "[0].revent = %d\n"
    "[1].fd = %d\n"
    "[1].event = %d\n"
    "[1].revent = %d\n",
    n,
    pfd[0].fd,
    pfd[0].events,
    pfd[0].revents,
    pfd[1].fd,
    pfd[1].events,
    pfd[1].revents);

    pfd[1].revents = 0;
    n = poll(&pfd[1], 1, 1000);
    printf("n = %d\n"
    "[1].fd = %d\n"
    "[1].event = %d\n"
    "[1].revent = %d\n",
    n,
    pfd[1].fd,
    pfd[1].events,
    pfd[1].revents);

    return 0;
}

$ gcc -Wall -o poll poll.c

$ ./poll
n = 2
[0].fd = 1
[0].event = 4
[0].revent = 4
[1].fd = 1
[1].event = 1
[1].revent = 4
n = 0
[1].fd = 1
[1].event = 1
[1].revent = 0

Note that "stdout" is inquired about ready-to-write (in [0]) and ready-to-read (in [1]).
Because it is ready-to-write, poll() returns immediately, but also having the response
ready-to-write in [1], where only "read"-compatible status (POLLIN, or POLLHUP, or POLLERR,
or just 0, if nothing of sorts was available) should have been posted -- but *never* POLLOUT!

Also note that [1] should have never been flagged as "ready", either, so the return code should have been 1, not 2.

Finally note that if [0] and [1] were swapped so that [0] was inquired for POLLIN, and [1] was inquired for POLLOUT,
the result would have still been incorrect on Cygwin ([0] returning POLLOUT for POLLIN inquired).

For the second invocation, when inquired just singly, the response is correct.

Now compare it with the correct behavior of the same code, all through, on Linux:

$ ./poll
n = 1
[0].fd = 1
[0].event = 4
[0].revent = 4
[1].fd = 1
[1].event = 1
[1].revent = 0
n = 0
[1].fd = 1
[1].event = 1
[1].revent = 0

P.S. The manual page for poll(2) says:

The bits returned in revents can include any of those specified in events, or one of the values POLLERR, POLLHUP, or POLLNVAL.

So returning POLLOUT(4) for POLLIN(1) violates the rule: bit 0 is NOT set in the binary representation of 4.

Anton Lavrentiev
Contractor NIH/NLM/NCBI


             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-26 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-26 17:04 Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] [this message]
2022-06-27  1:50 ` Takashi Yano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM8PR09MB7095D0733CD9A00FC0847434A5B69@DM8PR09MB7095.namprd09.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=lavr@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov \
    --cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).