From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mike Bresnahan" To: Subject: RE: -mno-cygwin Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 17:30:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <3B963C21.20250.398C83@localhost> X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00229.html Another option I found is the free Borland C++ compiler available at http://www.borland.com/bcppbuilder/freecompiler/ . It's not open source, but it is free of charge. However, it is not free of MS Visual C++ compatibility issues either. It does seem to work fine from the cygwin bash shell though. Mike ---- > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com > [ mailto:cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of Paul G. > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:52 PM > To: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re: -mno-cygwin > > > Hi folks, > > Given what cgf states below, depending on your needs of > course, it might be less hassle > to use Mingw tool set as it has no problems with C++ and, last I > checked, was working just fine > with libstdc++. > > So, as noted, -mno-cygwin WORKS with Cygwin gcc, but not > with Cygwin g++. For a > WORKING version of something approximating the bash command "g++ > -o -mno- > cygwin", it may simplify things immensely just to use Mingw "g++" > instead of Cygwin "g++ -mno- > cygwin". > > Paul G. > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/