From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6048 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2003 09:00:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 5379 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2003 09:00:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.elsag.de) (134.98.65.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2003 09:00:26 -0000 Received: from vwall.elsag.de by gateway.elsag.de via smtpd (for sources.redhat.com [67.72.78.213]) with SMTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:00:26 +0200 Received: from esmail by gateway.elsag.de via smtpd (for vwall.elsag.de [192.168.100.108]) with SMTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:00:25 +0200 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: *** unable to allocate heap, heap_chunk_size 0, Win32 error 0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 09:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Schaible?= To: X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg01464.txt.bz2 Ronald van Gogh wrote on Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:44 AM: > First of all, sorry, but I still don't know how to post a reply, > since I'm registered on the mailinglist in digestmode and nobody seems > to be able to > tell how to reply on a single mail I see in this list of mails. You might use gmane.org, that transforms the newslist into a normal news gr= oup. > This problem becomes very urgent to us. If we can't fix it we might > have to look for alternatives ! >=20 > As I've told before we're collecting information on a dominoserver > every 10 minutes by running a bash script (cygwin) scheduled by > Windows Scheduler > (Splinterware). We noticed that sometimes (once or twice a > day) this failed. > To check the cause we created a new small shell script, which only > writes a date and time to a file. Furthermore, to catch any > stdout/stderr messages, > we called the script by a batch file. The sources of both programs are > described below. You might give the new bash release a try, since a bug in the pipe handling= was detected by cfg, that manifested itself especially if a script was cal= led using bash from DOSish environment in combination with pipe redirection. Regards, J=F6rg -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/