From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12353 invoked by alias); 23 May 2002 09:50:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 12332 invoked from network); 23 May 2002 09:50:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO itdomain003.itdomain.net.au) (203.63.157.208) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 May 2002 09:50:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: Re[2]: setup-2.243 Crash / Install from Local Directory / WinXP X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 07:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robert Collins" To: "Pavel Tsekov" , "Cliff Hones" X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg01470.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:ptsekov@syntrex.com]=20 > Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 2:28 AM > To: Cliff Hones > Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: Re[2]: setup-2.243 Crash / Install from Local=20 > Directory / WinXP >=20 >=20 > Hello Cliff, >=20 > Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 4:22:57 PM, you wrote: >=20 > CH> Robert Collins wrote: >=20 > >> C'mon Max, you *know* I need more detail than that. > >>=20 > >> Install from Local works fine here. Even though it's only=20 > a snapshot,=20 > >> I wasn't aware of any -bugs- in the release. >=20 > CH> Why doesn't=20 > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-> 05/msg01210.html count=20 > CH>=20 > as a bug? Is it because it was on W98? >=20 > I've been tracing the exception with a disassembler - I'm not=20 > quite positve why exactly does the fault occur, but I can say=20 > for sure that it was caused from some code inside=20 > LogSingleton or LogFile classes. Maybe an exception being=20 > thrown from one of these... I can't be sure because it seems=20 > that the source provided along with the binary snapshot is=20 > not exactly the same as the one from which the binary was=20 > compiled... Robert, can you confirm/deny this assumption ? The source provided is the source that binary was created from. I use the build script I posted to create snapshots, and it uses make dist to create the source package. Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/