From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110927 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2019 16:38:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 110908 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2019 16:38:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Command X-HELO: NAM05-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com Received: from mail-eopbgr730099.outbound.protection.outlook.com (HELO NAM05-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (40.107.73.99) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Sep 2019 16:38:22 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=aObPabQ4TOi+ZJmlwah3Ih1rfD2fP1i/KCkPWSpILOlBeIM/MUFR2Mg68eQuPs6dI8PsymdlL/zcrRTnz9IKVcGgFuVH24UhyVaasfjBsrWIEGl9kmeIfbjrB24BJMVqY+28LGG2srN3fiSWPWjD+G/TW7WF5EJQJQOolJD1TmRsXkltLF3N2E8QDaghPpXXegFEIkcqWUBfasBWG5JJ6ICGjfOYdG9zbqfJXCaTjgCVHf4Tep8k6GrVeIbAjB15q2APila9Brsn6NHXkEQ9m/3/D4q5Gd15AS6RFl82+tHghvWhKR73J5mqpsEhFydz9p9D4kUOJm9IzziToxzvBA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aVpTtN1NWoMhSpoakipC81sqB/HpVFW3KMkkme8WRm4=; b=YLLb0/p7ozRkJfTY9ITy0HsspBWmCzBjJM5GslIlDEaMZTHnOIcbdpYqmjtfls7ZGCAyHKPXGEZO0KPNc6JYTm3oTYviNF8ckFJY9m/CKysMzbfIzzBGD1pP/kUY6OZNrlfOX9B+B7hUgq04rsL8PJm0B+z31AAjdspBZKjsums0VVSP0ZWYoRk76jK6gJUNS/sKo1wlUr/CRQZNpyiLm6DYmba/BkKk1gjiqujeyrAMOMExFhMMnjfxNKvrrm0CoPykkDGGmkhpPe9SRIir59x1SfN0CdkdNoLXsCNShnzw7XIotxrwrfJsFrQyGXXfXPEsDUS33h8Y39ykATfRDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=microsoft.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=microsoft.com; dkim=pass header.d=microsoft.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=aVpTtN1NWoMhSpoakipC81sqB/HpVFW3KMkkme8WRm4=; b=U3C1vvRHKyLhZkvLzDYZyiNoAnT5BcoMatjxrf4vBg/RCy7i1oJ6h414Bv/IRew8r5b3dp7ABIUxKIIy8kllZiAt/3p1bpS2m/QmMvSaLKqBtxabNAxqK/VGYgrAKiNBNtOQ7Fzwi5eVUkzABk9bQYFWuGGRIMq8o08T3pXuCJY= Received: from MWHPR21MB0845.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.173.51.139) by MWHPR21MB0479.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.172.102.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2263.4; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:38:20 +0000 Received: from MWHPR21MB0845.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3085:a037:7cbc:be5]) by MWHPR21MB0845.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3085:a037:7cbc:be5%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2241.014; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:38:20 +0000 From: "Stephen Provine via cygwin" Reply-To: Stephen Provine To: "cygwin@cygwin.com" , "Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca" Subject: RE: Command line processing in dcrt0.cc does not match Microsoft parsing rules Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 16:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=stephpr@microsoft.com; x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: FpbHS0UGinWZERYEc79U6Qu2t2aTaStFK4AXehNaeTrqlPFU+FMzVcC7QS58zv3mnk8rXTFatN+uw1V0aTrNxw== X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On 2019-08-30 21:58, Brian Inglis wrote: > Not being in the same Cygwin process group and lacking the appropriate in= terface > info indicates that the invoker was not Cygwin. Should I interpret this to mean the "winshell" parameter is not an accurate statement of what I thought it was for and because there is no way to relia= bly determine if the calling process was from Cygwin or not, behavior like I su= ggest is actually impossible? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple