From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21009 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2002 21:52:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 20969 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 21:52:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta02-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.42) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 21:52:55 -0000 Received: from loki ([213.104.70.126]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20021204215254.LOTG2181.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@loki> for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 21:52:54 +0000 From: "John Morrison" To: Subject: RE: defaults Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 13:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20021202155313.GE19575@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2 > From: Christopher Faylor > >The other would be to get people to use it ;) > > > >Well, that's my mental thoughts on paper(?!). Any comments? > >would it be worth doing? > > Here's how _update-info-dir does it: Thanks :) So - do you... 1) Think it's worth it 2) Think the _way_ I'm proposing is OK and, 3) think I should implement it? :) J. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/