From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24959 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2003 15:12:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@cygwin.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Received: (qmail 24753 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 15:12:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp7.hy.skanova.net) (195.67.199.140) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Sep 2003 15:12:25 -0000 Received: from P450 (t2o73p93.telia.com [62.20.218.213]) by smtp7.hy.skanova.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h88FCNhr015385 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:12:25 +0200 (CEST) From: "Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)" To: Subject: RE: Pondering on "cygcheck -c" output; Some "Incomplete" packages + multiple versions of "libxerces" Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 15:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00523.txt.bz2 > From: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com]On Behalf > Of Igor Pechtchanski > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > > > From: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com > [mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com]On Behalf > > > Of Igor Pechtchanski > > > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > > > > > > > Hmm... should I be concerned about these? > > > > > > > > I've seen "diff" and "XFree86-base" mentioned - and disregarded as > > > > important in previous messages here. But not the others. > ^^^^^^^^^ > I assume you mean "unimportant". "Regarded as unimportant" might had been a better wording from me. Sigh: IMO dis... + un... = double negation :-] Well... English is a picky language, translate that into Swedish and it will be acceptable AND understandable ;-). > > Missing file: /usr/lib/apache/new/libssl.dll from package mod_ssl > > mod_ssl 2.8.8-1.3.24-1 Incomplete > > Ok, I see. These packages are most likely performing the same postinstall > directory renaming trick as the one I complained about in > . Right... I'll stay behind on this from now on. > As before, > suggestions on how to deal with this are welcome. Stipe? /Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE - 59?16.37'N, 17?12.60'E --END OF MESSAGE-- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/