* screen [not found] <42AE548B.6050905@ekit-inc.com> @ 2005-06-14 12:14 ` Schulman.Andrew 2005-06-15 14:09 ` screen <THANKS so much for your work, at 1st glance/looks great, end of msg> Tom Rodman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Schulman.Andrew @ 2005-06-14 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin > Firstly I apologize for emailing you directly, I am not familiar with > posting to cygwin and couldn't see any other way to get in touch. No problem, but the approved method is to send your query to cygwin a cygwin d com, with "screen" in the subject. I should normally see that, and then other cygwin readers will also benefit from the discussion. > I am just trying to get hold of your screen build that you posted. > It seems to not be available any more via > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.2-1.tar.bz2 OK. I later changed the version number from 1 to 0test1, so the URLs for download are now http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.2-0test1.tar.bz2 (binary) http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.2-0test1-src.tar.bz2 (source) > I have been using it on a few pc's and would like to install it on > another but have stupidly deleted the package. > BTW it seems to work very well for me once I switched to a snapshot dll. > I Can detach,re-attach with no problems (all pc's running xp sp2) Yes, the reattachment problem is now solved AFAICT, using Cygwin 1.5.17 or later. Most of it works just fine, but there's one problem that I haven't solved yet: when you detach a session, it stays bound to its parent shell. So if you then try to exit the parent shell, it hangs. You can terminate the parent shell, but then screen exits too. Obviously this takes away one of the big advantages of screen, which is the ability to detach a session, leaving it running in the background, and then reattach later from a different terminal. I've gotten some hints about how to attack this problem, but I just haven't been able to spend any time on it yet. It's high on my to-do list. Screen is great, and if I can solve that one problem it will be ready for Cygwin. There are also a few terminal oddities and intermittent display problems. But these are minor, so I don't think I'll wait for them to release the package. At least, I can put it into testing so people can try it out while I work on resolving the other problems. > Thanks > > - Shaun -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen <THANKS so much for your work, at 1st glance/looks great, end of msg> 2005-06-14 12:14 ` screen Schulman.Andrew @ 2005-06-15 14:09 ` Tom Rodman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Tom Rodman @ 2005-06-15 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* screen [ping cgf]
@ 2007-02-15 21:27 Andrew Schulman
2007-02-15 21:47 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Schulman @ 2007-02-15 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cygwin
> Will this have any impact on having a version of screen that works?
I have a working version of screen on Cygwin. I use it daily, and it works
fine. With CYGWIN=tty set, the reattachment bug appears to be solved; it
detaches and reattaches sessions normally, which was a problem for a long
time. Not many patches are needed any more. More patches used to be
required, one of which was specific to Win9x, but I believe that
improvements in the Cygwin DLL have rendered those unnecessary now.
At this point I know of only one main outstanding bug in screen: when you
kill a window or the whole screen session, the child processes aren't
killed. They hang around and you have to kill them manually.
screen is an extremely useful program, that people have been asking for in
Cygwin for a long time. I'd be willing to package it, but when I floated
the idea a year ago or so, the feeling seemed to be that there were still
too many bugs to make it useful. If people can live with (or even better,
test and help me try to fix) the unkilled-child-process bug, then I'm
willing. I could release it as a test version.
Yes? No?
A.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen [ping cgf] 2007-02-15 21:27 screen [ping cgf] Andrew Schulman @ 2007-02-15 21:47 ` Christopher Faylor 2007-02-16 1:18 ` Andrew Schulman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2007-02-15 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 04:27:22PM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> Will this have any impact on having a version of screen that works? > >I have a working version of screen on Cygwin. I use it daily, and it works >fine. With CYGWIN=tty set, the reattachment bug appears to be solved; it >detaches and reattaches sessions normally, which was a problem for a long >time. Not many patches are needed any more. More patches used to be >required, one of which was specific to Win9x, but I believe that >improvements in the Cygwin DLL have rendered those unnecessary now. > >At this point I know of only one main outstanding bug in screen: when you >kill a window or the whole screen session, the child processes aren't >killed. They hang around and you have to kill them manually. > >screen is an extremely useful program, that people have been asking for in >Cygwin for a long time. I'd be willing to package it, but when I floated >the idea a year ago or so, the feeling seemed to be that there were still >too many bugs to make it useful. If people can live with (or even better, >test and help me try to fix) the unkilled-child-process bug, then I'm >willing. I could release it as a test version. > >Yes? No? What do I have to do with this? If you are responding to something that I said then please post a reference and don't leave everyone guessing. Otherwise propose to package it using the standard procedure. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen [ping cgf] 2007-02-15 21:47 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2007-02-16 1:18 ` Andrew Schulman 2007-02-16 14:09 ` Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Andrew Schulman @ 2007-02-16 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin > >screen is an extremely useful program, that people have been asking for in > >Cygwin for a long time. I'd be willing to package it, but when I floated > >the idea a year ago or so, the feeling seemed to be that there were still > >too many bugs to make it useful. If people can live with (or even better, > >test and help me try to fix) the unkilled-child-process bug, then I'm > >willing. I could release it as a test version. > > > >Yes? No? > > What do I have to do with this? If you are responding to something that > I said then please post a reference and don't leave everyone guessing. I was imagining that you would remember the conversation. http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-04/msg00183.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen [ping cgf] 2007-02-16 1:18 ` Andrew Schulman @ 2007-02-16 14:09 ` Christopher Faylor 2007-02-16 18:01 ` screen Andrew Schulman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2007-02-16 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 08:16:02PM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> >screen is an extremely useful program, that people have been asking for in >> >Cygwin for a long time. I'd be willing to package it, but when I floated >> >the idea a year ago or so, the feeling seemed to be that there were still >> >too many bugs to make it useful. If people can live with (or even better, >> >test and help me try to fix) the unkilled-child-process bug, then I'm >> >willing. I could release it as a test version. >> > >> >Yes? No? >> >> What do I have to do with this? If you are responding to something that >> I said then please post a reference and don't leave everyone guessing. > >I was imagining that you would remember the conversation. ...from almost two years ago. Uh huh. >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2005-04/msg00183.html So, as I so wisely said two years ago: If you can't use one of the major features of screen, it doesn't sound like the package is ready for prime time. And, just in case you're wondering if I am going to volunteer to help you track down problems - I'm not. So, maybe anyone who wants screen should volunteer to help. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2007-02-16 14:09 ` Christopher Faylor @ 2007-02-16 18:01 ` Andrew Schulman 2007-02-16 21:14 ` screen Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Andrew Schulman @ 2007-02-16 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin > And, just in case you're wondering if I am going to volunteer to help you > track down problems - I'm not. So, maybe anyone who wants screen should > volunteer to help. No, that was not my intention. I was trying to be courteous. But that's a two-way street. Forget it, I won't bother next time. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2007-02-16 18:01 ` screen Andrew Schulman @ 2007-02-16 21:14 ` Christopher Faylor 2007-02-18 16:29 ` screen Christopher Layne 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2007-02-16 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 01:01:23PM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> And, just in case you're wondering if I am going to volunteer to help you >> track down problems - I'm not. So, maybe anyone who wants screen should >> volunteer to help. > >No, that was not my intention. I was trying to be courteous. But that's a >two-way street. Forget it, I won't bother next time. Since you were pinging me and since (on rereading) you were consistently asking for help, I don't think it was a huge leap for me to surmise that you might be wanting my help debugging problems. By stating my intentions, I wanted to make it clear that someone else needs to step in. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2007-02-16 21:14 ` screen Christopher Faylor @ 2007-02-18 16:29 ` Christopher Layne 2007-02-18 16:49 ` screen Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Christopher Layne @ 2007-02-18 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:14:06PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 01:01:23PM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote: > >> And, just in case you're wondering if I am going to volunteer to help you > >> track down problems - I'm not. So, maybe anyone who wants screen should > >> volunteer to help. > > > >No, that was not my intention. I was trying to be courteous. But that's a > >two-way street. Forget it, I won't bother next time. > > Since you were pinging me and since (on rereading) you were consistently > asking for help, I don't think it was a huge leap for me to surmise that > you might be wanting my help debugging problems. By stating my > intentions, I wanted to make it clear that someone else needs to step > in. > > cgf You know this kind of things just shuts people off and turns them away right? People are trying to make progress, trying to make things better, and they're basically being told to go away. If he could do it himself, I'm sure he would have solved the issue by now. If he can't, perhaps he needs the help. I don't see what's so groundbreaking about "I'm not going to be able to help you with it now as I'm too busy, but perhaps throw the idea out there along with your observations and see who else bites." Is that somehow worse than "Look, I don't have the time to help you track down problems, find someone else." ? -cl -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2007-02-18 16:29 ` screen Christopher Layne @ 2007-02-18 16:49 ` Christopher Faylor 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2007-02-18 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 08:29:41AM -0800, Christopher Layne wrote: >On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 04:14:06PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 01:01:23PM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> >> And, just in case you're wondering if I am going to volunteer to help you >> >> track down problems - I'm not. So, maybe anyone who wants screen should >> >> volunteer to help. >> > >> >No, that was not my intention. I was trying to be courteous. But that's a >> >two-way street. Forget it, I won't bother next time. >> >> Since you were pinging me and since (on rereading) you were consistently >> asking for help, I don't think it was a huge leap for me to surmise that >> you might be wanting my help debugging problems. By stating my >> intentions, I wanted to make it clear that someone else needs to step >> in. > >You know this kind of things just shuts people off and turns them away right? >People are trying to make progress, trying to make things better, and they're >basically being told to go away. If he could do it himself, I'm sure he would >have solved the issue by now. If he can't, perhaps he needs the help. I don't >see what's so groundbreaking about "I'm not going to be able to help you with >it now as I'm too busy, but perhaps throw the idea out there along with your >observations and see who else bites." Is that somehow worse than "Look, I don't >have the time to help you track down problems, find someone else." ? Moved to the talk list. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen @ 2005-06-15 7:44 Shaun Broadbent 2005-06-15 14:11 ` screen Andrew Schulman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Shaun Broadbent @ 2005-06-15 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin Andrew.Schulman wrote ------------------- > OK. I later changed the version number from 1 to 0test1, so the URLs for > download are now > > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.2-0test1.tar.bz2 > (binary) > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.2-0test1-src.tar.bz2 > (source) Thank you for that. > Yes, the reattachment problem is now solved AFAICT, using Cygwin 1.5.17 or > later. Most of it works just fine, but there's one problem that I haven't > solved yet: when you detach a session, it stays bound to its parent > shell. So if you then try to exit the parent shell, it hangs. You can > terminate the parent shell, but then screen exits too. Obviously this > takes away one of the big advantages of screen, which is the ability to > detach a session, leaving it running in the background, and then reattach > later from a different terminal. hmm I have not had that problem? I run rxvt's with bash and can exit all terminals leaving no bash process but screen lives on. I can then fire up another shell and re-connect to screen and any jobs it has running. (ie it works just like it should!) - Shaun -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2005-06-15 7:44 screen Shaun Broadbent @ 2005-06-15 14:11 ` Andrew Schulman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Andrew Schulman @ 2005-06-15 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin >> Yes, the reattachment problem is now solved AFAICT, using Cygwin 1.5.17 or >> later. Most of it works just fine, but there's one problem that I haven't >> solved yet: when you detach a session, it stays bound to its parent >> shell. So if you then try to exit the parent shell, it hangs. You can >> terminate the parent shell, but then screen exits too. Obviously this >> takes away one of the big advantages of screen, which is the ability to >> detach a session, leaving it running in the background, and then reattach >> later from a different terminal. > > hmm I have not had that problem? I run rxvt's with bash and can exit all > terminals leaving no bash process but screen lives on. I can then fire > up another shell and re-connect to screen and any jobs it has running. > (ie it works just like it should!) Interesting. Okay, I hadn't noticed this before, but the problem does seem to be particular to the Cygwin console. It doesn't occur with rxvt. Also, it doesn't occur in the Cygwin console if I start a subshell first, and invoke screen from there. Maybe useful to know. Still, I do want to solve the problem before I release screen. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* screen @ 2003-04-26 16:24 Cant 2003-04-29 19:18 ` screen Karsten M. Self 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Cant @ 2003-04-26 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin How come when i use screen and i want to detach the screen then re-attach it again it says this... $ screen -r There is a screen on: There is no screen to be resumed. $ ps x PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME COMMAND 3264 1 3264 3264 ? 1012 11:21:33 /home/Cant/screen-3.9.15/screen 3276 3264 3276 3232 1 1012 11:21:34 /usr/bin/tcsh 212 3276 212 340 1 1012 11:21:40 /usr/bin/links 1556 3520 1556 1580 0 1012 11:22:43 /usr/bin/tcsh 1576 1556 1576 2072 0 1012 11:23:23 /usr/bin/ps $ the links is in the screen session and i cant re-attach it in order to get back to it... ]; any ideas? -- --------------------------------------------------------------- brian AT nkjo DOT torun DOT pOlAND You got questions? We got mean-ass otters with two middle fingers...! --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2003-04-26 16:24 screen Cant @ 2003-04-29 19:18 ` Karsten M. Self 2003-04-29 21:07 ` screen Igor Pechtchanski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Karsten M. Self @ 2003-04-29 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin on Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Cant (cant_reed@yahoo.com) wrote: > How come when i use screen and i want to detach the screen then re-attach it > again it says this... > > $ screen -r > There is a screen on: > There is no screen to be resumed. > $ ps x > PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME COMMAND > 3264 1 3264 3264 ? 1012 11:21:33 > /home/Cant/screen-3.9.15/screen > 3276 3264 3276 3232 1 1012 11:21:34 /usr/bin/tcsh > 212 3276 212 340 1 1012 11:21:40 /usr/bin/links > 1556 3520 1556 1580 0 1012 11:22:43 /usr/bin/tcsh > 1576 1556 1576 2072 0 1012 11:23:23 /usr/bin/ps > $ > > the links is in the screen session and i cant re-attach it in order to get > back to it... ]; any ideas? I'd love to have your problem. Where'd you find 'screen'? Try 'screen -ls' to list currently active screen sessions. It's possible that the cygwin port is borked. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? SCO is the thief who puts a gun to his own head and says give me your money or I'll shoot. -- Bruce Perens http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=56225&&cid=5456337 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2003-04-29 19:18 ` screen Karsten M. Self @ 2003-04-29 21:07 ` Igor Pechtchanski 2003-04-30 2:50 ` screen Karsten M. Self 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Igor Pechtchanski @ 2003-04-29 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karsten M. Self; +Cc: cygwin On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Cant (cant_reed@yahoo.com) wrote: > > How come when i use screen and i want to detach the screen then re-attach it > > again it says this... > > > > $ screen -r > > There is a screen on: > > There is no screen to be resumed. > > $ ps x > > PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME COMMAND > > 3264 1 3264 3264 ? 1012 11:21:33 > > /home/Cant/screen-3.9.15/screen > > 3276 3264 3276 3232 1 1012 11:21:34 /usr/bin/tcsh > > 212 3276 212 340 1 1012 11:21:40 /usr/bin/links > > 1556 3520 1556 1580 0 1012 11:22:43 /usr/bin/tcsh > > 1576 1556 1576 2072 0 1012 11:23:23 /usr/bin/ps > > $ > > > > the links is in the screen session and i cant re-attach it in order to get > > back to it... ]; any ideas? > > I'd love to have your problem. Where'd you find 'screen'? > > Try 'screen -ls' to list currently active screen sessions. It's > possible that the cygwin port is borked. > > Peace. There is no Cygwin port (or an official package) of screen. I posted a patch a while ago that would make it compile (and sort of run). It's possible that screen relies on some features that aren't portable. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2003-04-29 21:07 ` screen Igor Pechtchanski @ 2003-04-30 2:50 ` Karsten M. Self 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Karsten M. Self @ 2003-04-30 2:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin on Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 03:57:37PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski (pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu) wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > > on Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Cant (cant_reed@yahoo.com) wrote: > > > How come when i use screen and i want to detach the screen then re-attach it > > > again it says this... > > > > > > $ screen -r > > > There is a screen on: > > > There is no screen to be resumed. > > > $ ps x > > > PID PPID PGID WINPID TTY UID STIME COMMAND > > > 3264 1 3264 3264 ? 1012 11:21:33 > > > /home/Cant/screen-3.9.15/screen > > > 3276 3264 3276 3232 1 1012 11:21:34 /usr/bin/tcsh > > > 212 3276 212 340 1 1012 11:21:40 /usr/bin/links > > > 1556 3520 1556 1580 0 1012 11:22:43 /usr/bin/tcsh > > > 1576 1556 1576 2072 0 1012 11:23:23 /usr/bin/ps > > > $ > > > > > > the links is in the screen session and i cant re-attach it in order to get > > > back to it... ]; any ideas? > > > > I'd love to have your problem. Where'd you find 'screen'? > > > > Try 'screen -ls' to list currently active screen sessions. It's > > possible that the cygwin port is borked. > > > > Peace. > > There is no Cygwin port (or an official package) of screen. I posted a > patch a while ago that would make it compile (and sort of run). It's > possible that screen relies on some features that aren't portable. Ah. I remember using it at one point, and noting that it didn't work particularly well.... Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? The Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act: Feinstein's answer to Enron envy. http://www.politechbot.com/docs/cbdtpa/hollings.s2048.032102.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* screen @ 2003-04-12 0:43 Cant 2003-04-12 0:50 ` screen Igor Pechtchanski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Cant @ 2003-04-12 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin just for fun i thought i would try and install screen... but for some reason when i go to make it, it says this: $ make CPP="gcc -E " srcdir=. sh ./osdef.sh AWK=gawk CC="gcc -g -O2" srcdir=. sh ./comm.sh AWK=gawk srcdir=. sh ./term.sh gcc -c -I. -I. -g -O2 screen.c gcc -c -I. -I. -g -O2 ansi.c gcc -c -I. -I. -g -O2 fileio.c gcc -c -I. -I. -g -O2 mark.c gcc -c -I. -I. -g -O2 misc.c misc.c: In function `xsetenv': misc.c:648: too few arguments to function `setenv' make: *** [misc.o] Error 1 $ any thoughts..? -- --------------------------------------------------------------- brian AT nkjo DOT torun DOT pOlAND You got questions? We got busy phones... --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2003-04-12 0:43 screen Cant @ 2003-04-12 0:50 ` Igor Pechtchanski 2003-04-12 0:51 ` screen Cant 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Igor Pechtchanski @ 2003-04-12 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cant; +Cc: cygwin [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1041 bytes --] On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Cant wrote: > just for fun i thought i would try and install screen... but for some > reason when i go to make it, it says this: > > $ make > [snip] > gcc -c -I. -I. -g -O2 misc.c > misc.c: In function `xsetenv': > misc.c:648: too few arguments to function `setenv' > make: *** [misc.o] Error 1 > $ > > any thoughts..? Which version of screen? I've attached my patch for 3.9.13. > --------------------------------------------------------------- > brian AT nkjo DOT torun DOT pOlAND > You got questions? We got busy phones... > --------------------------------------------------------------- I like this one. How about: "You got questions? We got a mean otter with an AK-47..."? ;-) Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II [-- Attachment #2: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 8048 bytes --] diff -u -p -r orig/screen-3.9.13/configure.in ./configure.in --- orig/screen-3.9.13/configure.in 2002-08-12 10:34:14.000000000 -0400 +++ ./configure.in 2002-09-09 16:39:27.000000000 -0400 @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ dnl Solaris seteuid doesn't change the dnl multiuser screen sessions AC_CHECKING(seteuid) AC_TRY_LINK(,[ -#if defined(linux) || defined(NeXT) || defined(_AUX_SOURCE) || defined(AUX) || defined(ultrix) || (defined(sun) && defined(SVR4)) || defined(ISC) || defined(sony_news) +#if defined(linux) || defined(NeXT) || defined(_AUX_SOURCE) || defined(AUX) || defined(ultrix) || (defined(sun) && defined(SVR4)) || defined(ISC) || defined(sony_news) || defined (__CYGWIN__) seteuid_is_broken(0); #else seteuid(0); @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ fi if test -z "$load" ; then AC_EGREP_CPP(yes, -[#if defined(NeXT) || defined(apollo) || defined(linux) +[#if defined(NeXT) || defined(apollo) || defined(linux) || defined (__CYGWIN__) yes; #endif ], load=1) diff -u -p -r orig/screen-3.9.13/loadav.c ./loadav.c --- orig/screen-3.9.13/loadav.c 2002-01-08 10:43:43.000000000 -0500 +++ ./loadav.c 2002-09-09 16:39:27.000000000 -0400 @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static int loadok; /***************************************************************/ -#if defined(linux) && !defined(LOADAV_DONE) +#if (defined(linux) || defined (__CYGWIN__)) && !defined(LOADAV_DONE) #define LOADAV_DONE /* * This is the easy way. It relies in /proc being mounted. @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ GetLoadav() } return i; } -#endif /* linux */ +#endif /* linux || __CYGWIN__ */ /***************************************************************/ diff -u -p -r orig/screen-3.9.13/misc.c ./misc.c --- orig/screen-3.9.13/misc.c 2002-08-29 10:47:36.000000000 -0400 +++ ./misc.c 2002-09-09 16:39:27.000000000 -0400 @@ -638,11 +638,11 @@ char *value; */ # endif /* NEEDSETENV */ #else /* USESETENV */ -# if defined(linux) || defined(__convex__) || (BSD >= 199103) +# if defined(linux) || defined(__convex__) || (BSD >= 199103) || defined (__CYGWIN__) setenv(var, value, 1); # else setenv(var, value); -# endif /* linux || convex || BSD >= 199103 */ +# endif /* linux || convex || BSD >= 199103 || __CYGWIN__ */ #endif /* USESETENV */ } diff -u -p -r orig/screen-3.9.13/os.h ./os.h --- orig/screen-3.9.13/os.h 2002-01-08 10:42:33.000000000 -0500 +++ ./os.h 2002-09-09 16:39:27.000000000 -0400 @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ # define hpux #endif -#if defined(__bsdi__) || defined(__386BSD__) || defined(_CX_UX) || defined(hpux) || defined(_IBMR2) || defined(linux) +#if defined(__bsdi__) || defined(__386BSD__) || defined(_CX_UX) || defined(hpux) || defined(_IBMR2) || defined(linux) || defined (__CYGWIN__) # include <signal.h> -#endif /* __bsdi__ || __386BSD__ || _CX_UX || hpux || _IBMR2 || linux */ +#endif /* __bsdi__ || __386BSD__ || _CX_UX || hpux || _IBMR2 || linux || __CYGWIN__ */ #ifdef ISC # ifdef ENAMETOOLONG @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ extern int errno; #endif #if defined(UTMPOK) || defined(BUGGYGETLOGIN) -# if defined(SVR4) && !defined(DGUX) && !defined(__hpux) && !defined(linux) +# if defined(SVR4) && !defined(DGUX) && !defined(__hpux) && !defined(linux) && !defined (__CYGWIN__) # include <utmpx.h> # define UTMPFILE UTMPX_FILE # define utmp utmpx @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ extern int errno; #endif /* Geeeee, reverse it? */ -#if defined(SVR4) || (defined(SYSV) && defined(ISC)) || defined(_AIX) || defined(linux) || defined(ultrix) || defined(__386BSD__) || defined(__bsdi__) || defined(POSIX) || defined(NeXT) +#if defined(SVR4) || (defined(SYSV) && defined(ISC)) || defined(_AIX) || defined(linux) || defined(ultrix) || defined(__386BSD__) || defined(__bsdi__) || defined(POSIX) || defined(NeXT) || defined (__CYGWIN__) # define SIGHASARG #endif diff -u -p -r orig/screen-3.9.13/osdef.sh ./osdef.sh --- orig/screen-3.9.13/osdef.sh 2001-06-18 13:08:15.000000000 -0400 +++ ./osdef.sh 2002-09-09 16:39:27.000000000 -0400 @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ cat << EOF > osdef0.c #ifndef sun #include <sys/ioctl.h> #endif -#ifdef linux +#if defined(linux) || defined (__CYGWIN__) #include <string.h> #include <stdlib.h> #endif diff -u -p -r orig/screen-3.9.13/pty.c ./pty.c --- orig/screen-3.9.13/pty.c 2002-02-11 07:44:18.000000000 -0500 +++ ./pty.c 2002-09-09 16:39:27.000000000 -0400 @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ RCS_ID("$Id: pty.c,v 1.6 1994/05/31 12:3 #endif /* for solaris 2.1, Unixware (SVR4.2) and possibly others */ -#ifdef HAVE_SVR4_PTYS +#if defined(HAVE_SVR4_PTYS) && !defined(__CYGWIN__) # include <sys/stropts.h> #endif @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ int f; { if (f < 0) return; -#if defined(I_PUSH) && defined(HAVE_SVR4_PTYS) && !defined(sgi) && !defined(linux) && !defined(__osf__) && !defined(M_UNIX) +#if defined(I_PUSH) && defined(HAVE_SVR4_PTYS) && !defined(sgi) && !defined(linux) && !defined(__osf__) && !defined(M_UNIX) && !defined (__CYGWIN__) if (ioctl(f, I_PUSH, "ptem")) Panic(errno, "InitPTY: cannot I_PUSH ptem"); if (ioctl(f, I_PUSH, "ldterm")) @@ -244,13 +244,13 @@ char **ttyn; register int f; char *m, *ptsname(); int unlockpt __P((int)), grantpt __P((int)); -#if defined(HAVE_GETPT) && defined(linux) +#if defined(HAVE_GETPT) && (defined(linux) || defined (__CYGWIN__)) int getpt __P((void)); #endif sigret_t (*sigcld)__P(SIGPROTOARG); strcpy(PtyName, "/dev/ptmx"); -#if defined(HAVE_GETPT) && defined(linux) +#if defined(HAVE_GETPT) && (defined(linux) || defined (__CYGWIN__)) if ((f = getpt()) == -1) #else if ((f = open(PtyName, O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY)) == -1) diff -u -p -r orig/screen-3.9.13/screen.c ./screen.c --- orig/screen-3.9.13/screen.c 2002-08-29 06:14:20.000000000 -0400 +++ ./screen.c 2002-09-09 17:53:28.000000000 -0400 @@ -984,8 +984,10 @@ char **av; n = (eff_uid == 0 && (real_uid || (st.st_mode & 0775) != 0775)) ? 0755 : (eff_gid == st.st_gid && eff_gid != real_gid) ? 0775 : 0777; +#if !defined(__CYGWIN__) if ((st.st_mode & 0777) != n) Panic(0, "Directory '%s' must have mode %03o.", SockDir, n); +#endif } sprintf(SockPath, "%s/S-%s", SockDir, LoginName); if (access(SockPath, F_OK)) @@ -1015,8 +1017,10 @@ char **av; if (st.st_uid != real_uid) Panic(0, "You are not the owner of %s.", SockPath); } +#if !defined(__CYGWIN__) if ((st.st_mode & 0777) != 0700) Panic(0, "Directory %s must have mode 700.", SockPath); +#endif if (SockMatch && index(SockMatch, '/')) Panic(0, "Bad session name '%s'", SockMatch); SockName = SockPath + strlen(SockPath) + 1; diff -u -p -r orig/screen-3.9.13/utmp.c ./utmp.c --- orig/screen-3.9.13/utmp.c 2002-08-22 15:26:34.000000000 -0400 +++ ./utmp.c 2002-09-09 16:39:27.000000000 -0400 @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void endutent __P((void)); static int initutmp __P((void)); static void setutent __P((void)); #endif -#if defined(linux) && defined(GETUTENT) +#if (defined(linux) || defined (__CYGWIN__)) && defined(GETUTENT) static struct utmp *xpututline __P((struct utmp *utmp)); # define pututline xpututline #endif @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ makedead(u) struct utmp *u; { u->ut_type = DEAD_PROCESS; -#if !defined(linux) || defined(EMPTY) +#if (!defined(linux) && !defined (__CYGWIN__)) || defined(EMPTY) u->ut_exit.e_termination = 0; u->ut_exit.e_exit = 0; #endif @@ -611,7 +611,7 @@ int pid; u->ut_type = USER_PROCESS; strncpy(u->ut_user, user, sizeof(u->ut_user)); /* Now the tricky part... guess ut_id */ -#if defined(sgi) || defined(linux) +#if defined(sgi) || defined(linux) || defined (__CYGWIN__) strncpy(u->ut_id, line + 3, sizeof(u->ut_id)); #else /* sgi */ # ifdef _IBMR2 @@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ getlogin() } # endif /* BUGGYGETLOGIN */ -#if defined(linux) && defined(GETUTENT) +#if (defined(linux) || defined (__CYGWIN__)) && defined(GETUTENT) # undef pututline /* aargh, linux' pututline returns void! */ [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 214 bytes --] -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2003-04-12 0:50 ` screen Igor Pechtchanski @ 2003-04-12 0:51 ` Cant 2003-04-12 0:53 ` screen Igor Pechtchanski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Cant @ 2003-04-12 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin well i have .15 will it still work and how do i apply the patch? ps. whats with the otter? Uzytkownik "Igor Pechtchanski" <pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu> napisal w wiadomosci news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0304111954160.26381-200000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu... > On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Cant wrote: > > > just for fun i thought i would try and install screen... but for some > > reason when i go to make it, it says this: > > > > $ make > > [snip] > > gcc -c -I. -I. -g -O2 misc.c > > misc.c: In function `xsetenv': > > misc.c:648: too few arguments to function `setenv' > > make: *** [misc.o] Error 1 > > $ > > > > any thoughts..? > > Which version of screen? I've attached my patch for 3.9.13. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > brian AT nkjo DOT torun DOT pOlAND > > You got questions? We got busy phones... > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > I like this one. How about: "You got questions? We got a mean otter with > an AK-47..."? ;-) > Igor > -- > http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ > |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu > ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com > |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski > '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! > > Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. > -- Leto II > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2003-04-12 0:51 ` screen Cant @ 2003-04-12 0:53 ` Igor Pechtchanski 2003-04-12 0:56 ` screen Cant 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Igor Pechtchanski @ 2003-04-12 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cant; +Cc: cygwin Try "patch -p0 < patchfile" from the screen source directory. Be prepared, thought, that it might reject some chunks... You'll have to adapt the chunks rejected yourself. As for the otter, see the following thread: <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-04/msg01143.html> Igor On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Cant wrote: > well i have .15 will it still work and how do i apply the patch? > > ps. whats with the otter? > > Uzytkownik "Igor Pechtchanski" <pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu> napisal w wiadomosci news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0304111954160.26381-200000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu... > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Cant wrote: > > > > > just for fun i thought i would try and install screen... but for some > > > reason when i go to make it, it says this: > > > > > > $ make > > > [snip] > > > gcc -c -I. -I. -g -O2 misc.c > > > misc.c: In function `xsetenv': > > > misc.c:648: too few arguments to function `setenv' > > > make: *** [misc.o] Error 1 > > > $ > > > > > > any thoughts..? > > > > Which version of screen? I've attached my patch for 3.9.13. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > brian AT nkjo DOT torun DOT pOlAND > > > You got questions? We got busy phones... > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > I like this one. How about: "You got questions? We got a mean otter with > > an AK-47..."? ;-) > > Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. -- Leto II -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2003-04-12 0:53 ` screen Igor Pechtchanski @ 2003-04-12 0:56 ` Cant 2003-04-12 0:56 ` screen Cant 0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread From: Cant @ 2003-04-12 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin well great it worked... wonderful except when i go to detach i cant reattach it again... any more thoughts...? ps. aha... very funny... Uzytkownik "Igor Pechtchanski" <pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu> napisal w wiadomosci news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0304112001180.26381-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu... > Try "patch -p0 < patchfile" from the screen source directory. Be > prepared, thought, that it might reject some chunks... You'll have to > adapt the chunks rejected yourself. > > As for the otter, see the following thread: > <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-04/msg01143.html> > Igor > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Cant wrote: > > > well i have .15 will it still work and how do i apply the patch? > > > > ps. whats with the otter? > > > > Uzytkownik "Igor Pechtchanski" <pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu> napisal w wiadomosci news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0304111954160.26381-200000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu... > > > On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Cant wrote: > > > > > > > just for fun i thought i would try and install screen... but for some > > > > reason when i go to make it, it says this: > > > > > > > > $ make > > > > [snip] > > > > gcc -c -I. -I. -g -O2 misc.c > > > > misc.c: In function `xsetenv': > > > > misc.c:648: too few arguments to function `setenv' > > > > make: *** [misc.o] Error 1 > > > > $ > > > > > > > > any thoughts..? > > > > > > Which version of screen? I've attached my patch for 3.9.13. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > brian AT nkjo DOT torun DOT pOlAND > > > > You got questions? We got busy phones... > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > I like this one. How about: "You got questions? We got a mean otter with > > > an AK-47..."? ;-) > > > Igor > > -- > http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ > |\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu > ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ igor@watson.ibm.com > |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski > '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! > > Knowledge is an unending adventure at the edge of uncertainty. > -- Leto II > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: screen 2003-04-12 0:56 ` screen Cant @ 2003-04-12 0:56 ` Cant 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: Cant @ 2003-04-12 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cygwin [; -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Screen @ 1998-10-04 15:45 cv23iuy 0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread From: cv23iuy @ 1998-10-04 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: egcs SUBLIMINALLY ENTICE ANY WOMAN TO BE YOURS! GUARANTEED. We know you may be skeptical, but if you're not totally satisfied with your sex life and who you're dating you owe it to yourself to visit our web site (your choice of ENGLISH or ESPANOL) at http://208.166.10.22/ and learn how the power of subliminal mind control can change your life. It is simply a fact that sexual impulses can be awakened and greatly intensified by using subliminal commands. We guarantee it! But, most subliminal enticement tapes don't work. Confused? Take 1 minute, go to http://208.166.10.22/ and read the section entitled "THE NUMBER 1 REASON OUR TAPES WORK AND THEIRS DON'T!" to find out why. If nothing else, you'll get a good laugh at how downright silly some other tapes are. EVERYTHING (AND WE MEAN EVERYTHING!) TO GAIN AND NOTHING TO LOSE! We're so sure that OUR tapes work that every one comes with a 100% MONEY BACK GUARANTEE! Now that you know about the hottest tapes on the Internet, you have no excuse not to be successful with any woman you choose. If you don't get the facts, you are cheating yourself out of HAPPINESS, ROMANCE, GREAT SEX and the TIME OF YOUR LIFE! Click here http://208.166.10.22/ Millennium Creations, LLC 520 Washington Blvd., Suite 287 Marina Del Rey, Ca. 90292 310-281-6737 To be remove from future mailings, reply to: inside2000@AILJ0BAJLJI0D.NET with remove in the subject. Please understand that our system has filters and any files larger than 2K, foul language, multiple emails and/or attachments within the email will automatically delete your email without removal from our database. Thank you. - For help on using this list (especially unsubscribing), send a message to "gnu-win32-request@cygnus.com" with one line of text: "help". ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-18 16:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <42AE548B.6050905@ekit-inc.com> 2005-06-14 12:14 ` screen Schulman.Andrew 2005-06-15 14:09 ` screen <THANKS so much for your work, at 1st glance/looks great, end of msg> Tom Rodman 2007-02-15 21:27 screen [ping cgf] Andrew Schulman 2007-02-15 21:47 ` Christopher Faylor 2007-02-16 1:18 ` Andrew Schulman 2007-02-16 14:09 ` Christopher Faylor 2007-02-16 18:01 ` screen Andrew Schulman 2007-02-16 21:14 ` screen Christopher Faylor 2007-02-18 16:29 ` screen Christopher Layne 2007-02-18 16:49 ` screen Christopher Faylor -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2005-06-15 7:44 screen Shaun Broadbent 2005-06-15 14:11 ` screen Andrew Schulman 2003-04-26 16:24 screen Cant 2003-04-29 19:18 ` screen Karsten M. Self 2003-04-29 21:07 ` screen Igor Pechtchanski 2003-04-30 2:50 ` screen Karsten M. Self 2003-04-12 0:43 screen Cant 2003-04-12 0:50 ` screen Igor Pechtchanski 2003-04-12 0:51 ` screen Cant 2003-04-12 0:53 ` screen Igor Pechtchanski 2003-04-12 0:56 ` screen Cant 2003-04-12 0:56 ` screen Cant 1998-10-04 15:45 Screen cv23iuy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).