Re: DDD 3.3.7 compiles ootb (was - RE: DDD 3.3.5 success)

[Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu>]

On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:12:29AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >Now, does anyone care to package it? ;-)
>
> Haven't I already vetoed this once?
> cgf

Not that I recall.  I believe you vetoed cgdb (as Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
mentioned already).  If you did, I apologize.  If not, I'm assuming you're
planning to.

May I inquire why you propose to veto this package?  FWICS, there are some
clear advantages to using DDD over insight in some contexts (e.g., insight
is a frontend for gdb only, whereas DDD handles other debuggers, as stated
on the list recently; insight is a Win32 app, whereas DDD is an X app;
possibly others).  FWIW, I'd vote for it.

In any case, this discussion is moot until someone volunteers to maintain
it and posts a package proposal to cygwin-apps.  Perhaps this needs to be
continued on that list once this happens, unless you've already decided to
veto the package no matter what.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor@watson.ibm.com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/